• darkfiremp3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am very curious what price they can get this to. If traditional chicken breast is $11 a pound and this is $20, it’s going to be rough. If it’s around the same or cheaper, it could do very well!

    • CCatMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where is chicken breast $11 a pound? That’s like pasture raised organic prices where I am in the US.

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      for fast-food purposes, the plant-based meats (Impossible, Beyond Meat) were generally able to get in the door at parity with ordinary meat from what i can tell. i’m not sure about in-grocery-store, though. they’ve also been racked by waning consumer interest, probably because they seem “faddish” for lack of better wording. that, i honestly think, is the biggest hurdle to cultivated meat–not price.

      • TechyDad@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I buy Beyond Meat bricks for $8.99 a pound. That’s pricey compared to regular beef, but I’m an outlier with pricing. I keep kosher at home and kosher meat is VERY expensive. Between the price and hassle (it requires separate pots/pans, plates, utensils, etc), I keep vegetarian at home. It’s just cheaper and easier.

        Beyond Meat lets me cook “beef” dishes for less than kosher beef would cost me and with more flexibility. (Tonight, we had pasta and Beyond Beef meatballs with cheese - a dish I couldn’t make using kosher meat.)

        There’s still a market for products like Beyond Beef, but I agree that they’ll need to hit “normal need” price levels before it really takes off.

        • calculuschild@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh interesting. Kosher is a whole market I didn’t even think of with Beyond Meat.

          Is cultured meat considered “real meat” or “kosher” for your purposes? (I hope I’m using the term correctly)

          • TechyDad@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s actually a big debate happening in the kosher community.

            On one hand, you don’t need to do things like check every organ for signs of illness. As long as the vat doesn’t get infected with something, it’s good. You also don’t need to drain blood from the resulting meat since it doesn’t have any.

            On the other hand, if you take a cell from a living animal, is the whole mass in the vat considered a living creature? If so, eating from it might not be allowed (eating flesh from a live animal is forbidden). The lack of any kind of slaughter process could either mean they want harvested meat is fine or none of it is.

            There will likely be rabbis ruling both ways for awhile before any consensus emerges. If any ever does. (Judaism is very decentralized and consensus is often difficult to impossible.)

    • that_one_guy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m sure that it will initially cost a premium, before coming down in price as the technology matures. I’m also curious about the relative environmental impact that cultivated meat has versus raising livestock.

      ETA: I found a study regarding cultured meat’s environmental impact: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es200130u

      According to this study, cultured meat is 7-45% more energy efficient, emits 78-96% less CO2, requires 82-96% less water, and occupies 99% less land than raising livestock.

      • SkoomaCat@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dang, I figured CO2 emissions would be much better than traditional livestock but I wouldn’t have guessed that much better.

        • LobsterDog@frig.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Livestock is a huge CO2 contributor, coupled with the fact that you have to cut down trees to make room for them, it’s a huge problem.

        • Bowen@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? The water and ghg emission is nearly at the same level as fruits and veggies from what I can tell. That’s intense. Energy use is still pretty high but I imagine that’ll get optimized over time. Low key excited to try it too, I wasn’t too sold on the meat alternatives from beyondmeat, but this looks very interesting.