• donuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sadly, that’s wrong. According to established international humanitarian law, it is justified to counter-attack hospitals in the event that they are used to gather recon or stage attacks. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/protection-hospitals-during-armed-conflicts-what-law-says

      That’s why staging attacks or garrisoning troops at hospitals, thus turning the sick and injured into human shields, is not only a horrible and inhumane thing to do, but also a war crime.

      At some level Hamas knows this, and so the question is why they would do even do it? Is it because they think that using human shields is an effective deterrence? Or is it because they want to provoke an IDF counter-attack against a hospital so they can use it in their propaganda? Either way, it’s a war crime on Hamas’ part and generally terrible for the innocent people in Gaza.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas knows they can and will retaliate so they form their strategy to leverage this. And Israel thinks they can get away with bombing hospitals by dumping shit tons of money on pr. What should be done is it should be made illegal according to international humanitarian laws, god knows why it isn’t.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not talking about the law. Laws change over time. Not all laws are just. Not everything just is a law.

        • donuts@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          So in your own personal sense of justice, is it just to wage militant attacks from hospitals and other civilian resources?

          Personally I think it’s wrong to use sick and injured people as human shields.

          • interceder270@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Neither side is justified.

            Hamas hiding behind civilians isn’t justification to kill the civilians.

            Edit: he downvoted me in less than a minute, lol. I guess we know where he stands on the bias spectrum.

            He thinks Israel is justified in killing these civilians. Wow.

            • donuts@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not talking about the law. Laws change over time.

              I downvoted you because frankly I think that is a dumb and irrelevant thing to say. The world doesn’t work based on your, or mine, or anyone else’s personal sense of justice, nor should it. That’s why international law exists.

              Under international humanitarian law, Hamas using sick people as a human shield is giving the IDF every excuse and legal justification they need to counter-attack the hospitals that they are using to state those attacks. Period.

              I would vastly prefer if Hamas didn’t do that. I would vastly prefer that the IDF didn’t have legal justification for attacking hospitals. But what I prefer doesn’t mean shit.

              But I guess when you can’t argue against the substance of what I’m saying you can only make embarrassing claims about the timing of meaningless internet points.

              Oh well, whatever. Have a good one.