• SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not what I’m saying, I’m saying the act of “not buying it” (even if it was a complete and total boycott) has no impact on the production due to the system of subsidies, futures, derivatives, etc. that is set up explicitly to make sure production continues. And therefore has no impact on land/water usage, suffering etc.

    With the point being that it’s a good first step, but if your expectation is it will change anything without first changing the underlying system you will be very disappointed.

    • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are u saying if over night the entire customer base of meat as a whole stopped buying it would have zero effect? Certainly thats not whay youre saying right?

    • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Surely the societal pressure to change the systems that support factory farming of animals will grow pretty much in proportion with the vegan/vegetarian population? I don’t like the defeatist attitude that our choises as consumers don’t matter, at all.

      • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not defeatist, it’s pushing back against the wishful thinking that “voting with your dollar” is effective and your responsibility ends there.

        • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean if they make substantially less money with product x they scale back production. Just like with any other product.

          Really not that complicated. Obviously they’re not tracking my personal consumption, nobody believes that.

    • amzd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your argument is called the nirvana fallacy;

      “World peace would be ideal; this peace treaty fails to completely achieve world peace; therefore this peace treaty is not worth doing.”

      And I do not accept that.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s not a nirvana fallacy. they’re actually right, being vegan has no impact at all. a peace treaty actually creates peace. buying beans just means beans are sold, it doesn’t do anything to change any of the problems.