• Pantherina@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard XMPP is better though. Servers are way less hard on resources, its way simpler and just as secure. Decentralization, you can share all sorts of files and all, but video calls are simply done by another provider like Jitsi

      • root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh interesting, I’ll check it out. I’m hosting my own server and I’m the only user on it, so it’s been pretty snappy :P

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Xmpp is long in the tooth, many basic things are missing, like sending a image with a text caption. Or sending a group of photos as an album, instead you can only make many many image posts.

        Lots of oh so small things

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        and just as secure

        The base procotol doesn’t have E2EE. You can do E2EE still but something to keep in mind.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is true, since the base protocol is dead simple without many frills since its goals is real-time communications, not a chat-specific protocol for humans (TLS is good enough for certain applications of the protocol). That said, most modern clients support PGP & OMEMO with many having the encryption on by default and required is usually an option as well. There were some talks about simplifying the OMEMO setup in the future, but it’s good enough for now. See Are we OMEMO yet? for client suggestions.