Edit: good to see I woke the shills

  • Cowbee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately, the time for a better candidate was last election cycle. Incumbency advantage is too critical to give up.

    That being said, voting harder won’t ever move America to the left, that has to be done at the grassroots level.

    • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Incumbency advantage is too critical to give up.

      At this point, what advantage? He’s been polling worse than Trump. He’s more of an anchor than an engine now.

      That being said, voting harder won’t ever move America to the left, that has to be done at the grassroots level.

      With Dems there’s always an excuse to do nothing and hope really hard for vague change later.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Incumbency advantage persists. Swapping to a new candidate would likely be worse, even if the candidate is better, purely based on electoralism.

        Yes, the dems do nothing. This is better than Republicans, who do a lot of bad shit. Voting dem won’t fix issues, it will just prevent many more from cropping up. What fixes issues is grassroots praxis.

        • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Incumbency advantage persists. Swapping to a new candidate would likely be worse, even if the candidate is better, purely based on electoralism.

          I’m sure many people will be comforted by that when he loses.

          Yes, the dems do nothing. This is better than Republicans, who do a lot of bad shit.

          Read up on the Ratchet Effect.

          What fixes issues is grassroots praxis.

          I too, like vague undefined concepts that obfuscate real potential solutions.