• algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course battery technology improved, but the amount of news articles claiming XYZ will change technology forever outnumbers the actual number of innovations 100 to 1

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your standerd science article is written by someone with a half remembered high school science education rephrasing another person with the same background who has on rare occasion actually talked to the people who wrote the study. Both of these people don’t understand what’s actually happened but need to make it sound like it’s as big a deal as possible to get clicks.

      We’ve found a incremental improvement in sodium ion that may do something becomes sodium ion is going to take over the world in very short order.

      • averyminya@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s about scalability and all the options on the table. We’ve got self-recharging diamond batteries that contain plutonium from refined nuclear waste estimated to last a minimum of 20,000 years. Theoretically this could entirely replace batteries needed for pacemakers and any small cell battery. There could be ways to scale it up even further, we’ll just have to figure out a way how.

        That’s just as promising as sodium power because it gives us another opportunity. It’s a way to reduce waste (nuclear waste is tricky to get rid of). It’s just about ability to deliver. Diamond batteries have been in production and were supposed to be available this year - chances are slim that will still be the case though lol.