• betahack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    and you know what, it won’t matter. not one bit. because people are lazy and people don’t care or are indifferent.

    look at reddit. big uproar…for a few days, weeks. now pretty much back to normal.

    even myself, I still go back to certain communities because they don’t exist elsewhere. and like someone else said it’s not just software or platforms, it’s people and countries, etc. etc.

    it’s hard to make changes and have them stick. it’s even harder to convince people to leave the easy and known for the not so easy and unknown.

    and I think we’re going to see lots more…lots, lots more. it will be the new normal.

    • Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went to reddit for Valve memes, but now I decided to make my own community here for it. The only problem is NO ONE ELSE FUCKING POSTS!

      • themusicman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What’s the Lemmy community? I’m already subbed to sourcememes.

        Edit: oh yeah that’s just you. Enjoying your content and will try to post occasionally

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unity was the biggest stumble.

      Publishers hate surprise fees, distribution platforms absolutely won’t pay per download, developers (companies) are stretching budgets as it is, and the individual developers are quick to anger and will hold a grudge for eternity.

      They really gutted themselves.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The stupid idea went forward despite warning from people within the fucking company, no less. All because they wanted to get some of Hoyogames (Genshin and Honkai Impact)'s juicy profits

    • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And god forbid you point out the fact that this attitude among consumers is exactly the reason these companies are brazen enough to pull this shit. People don’t want to hear how their attitudes around instant gratification and focus on convenience over absolutely all else just might have consequences.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I literally debated someone yesterday over whether or not it’s the consumers willingness to buy that created the demand for a product.

        Dude straight up tried to argue that it’s the company’s fault for making a product, as if they wouldn’t do it specifically because they’re going to make money on it.

        This website is full of kids who can’t grasp basic economic principles. If everyone stopped buying, all these businesses would go under. They don’t care about the social media bitching, the only way to get the message across is the only thing they care about.

        Stop giving them your money.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          On one hand yes, if everyone stopped buying their product then the company would go under. Just like if you just eat less, you’d lose weight

          But these such oversimplifications that they lead to the wrong conclusions. You want to lose weight? Learn about nutrition, avoid triggers, and learn to cook from single ingredients. Raw willpower can work… But it’s basically the worst strategy. Most people can’t do it, and most of them that do regain the weight within 18 months

          You want companies to stop doing consumer hostile things that destroy companies? You need to look at the small number of people making profits on the process of destroying the company

          The problem with economics is that it’s taught like a religion. You get nice, believable mechanisms, but not only are they not tested empirically when they’re adopted, it takes decades of being obviously false for the idea to lose steam.

          Inflation is an example… Wage growth is empirically not tightly coupled to it - we have the numbers, they aren’t ambiguous. But you tell this to people and they’ll scoff, because the commonly used model of economics says so in a neatly packaged narrative.

          Voting with your wallet is the same. Refusing to buy a product does not push a company in a desired direction, they’ll (accurately) see it as a pr and/or marketing problem. It’s cheaper to change the minds of consumers than the build better products, it’s cheaper to lobby governments than to clean up after yourself, and it’s easier, more reliable, and highly profitable to reposition yourself to win big by tanking a company than it is to making it better

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I’m not talking about asking for forgiveness… What I’m saying is that you can straight up make enormous profit in tanking a company, and it’s not even illegal. You just have to do it right

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem with that reasoning is that capitalists have a means of generating demand artificially.

    • soloner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still left Reddit and unity and haven’t returned. Some people do care. Not everyone is indifferent.