• sucius1@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as they remain open source I see no problem with that. I use both in my server and they’re both great products, with the plus that you don’t have to deal with any of Google’s shitty practices.

    • dauerstaender@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being open source mean nothing if no one else can continue development, other than that yeah pretty great

      • sucius1@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being open source means exactly that, anyone can fork it and continue development if need be. I really don’t understand what you’re trying to say

        • prenatal_confusion@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe he was talking about capacity to develop further or fix bugs. In theory a community can do that (and actually do in many instances) but sometimes development of a community fork tagnates due to the lack of resources.

          Best example to disprove this theory is … Nextcloud. Owncloud went ahead and developed a new version in go to scale more easily but next cloud is the defacto standard for most people that were using own cloud before the fork.