• Akrenion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We do have a concept of limits in math. That doesn’t mean we ignore it. It is just more correct not to divide by zero as the limits from either side do not converge. Or would you allow -inf as an answer aswell? That is the answer if we approach the limit from the other side.

    It is not only convenience but rigor that dictates dividing by 0 to be an erroneus assumption.

    • Doctor xNo@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Infinite, just like 0, actually has no - or +. So yes and no. For all intents and purposes -inf == inf.

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One positive infinity doesn’t even necessarily equal another positive infinity, as two expressions might not approach infinity at the same rate. Note the word “approach”. That’s the only way you’re allowed to use infinity/-infinity, by approaching it. It’s not a real number, it doesn’t actually exist. Second, in most contexts (calculus) it strictly refers to magnitude (ie, it can have directionality applied to it). Take a calculus class if you want to learn more.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean this one?

            The projectively extended real number line is distinct from the affinely extended real number line, in which +∞ and −∞ are distinct.

            Now tell me, do we usually work with the projectively extended real numbers?