• teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That would lead to different focal lengths not different designs completely. Both optical systems for HST and KH were designed by Perkin Elmer so I’ll stick with my first thought that they would be very similar in capabilities.

    • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you watch the video?

      The tracking problems Hubble would have imaging the earth surface are a direct guide to what differences the design would be.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did you finish the video where they essentially say what I said in my first comment? Hubble and spy satellites share a lot of the same technologies. I wasn’t aware of the speed issue but other than that they are similar like I said.

            • Madlaine@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They have to rotate it fast enough, and hubble is not built to rotate that fast

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Is it an actual limitation of the hardware or a software safety limit? The designs are similar it more has to do with limitations put on it.

                They mention they can’t because the gyro vibrates, so it does sound like it’s capable of spinning faster it’s limited for specific reasons. Now are those reasons detrimental to its use or would they just have to get fancier.

                These can’t be answered.