I already have the desktop app, what difference should this even make? Pointless gatekeeping by the devs

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are a lot of features all these companies make available only on their mobile apps, because it’s where they have the most control (and access over your data). It’s the same for social media sites as well, because you can limit them a number of ways on a desktop browser.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t OP running the desktop app, though? If that’s the case, then this theory doesn’t really hold water, as desktop apps can do everything that mobile apps can do.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      because it’s where they have the most control (and access over your data).

      It shouldn’t be this way… Is there anything we can do against these practices? Client side.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tracker Control is an app that basically acts a DNS based blocker. Recognizes what your apps connect to, groups it into necessary and unnecessary domains and so on. It does set up a local VPN though, so you can’t use it alongside an actual VPN.

        The Duckduckgo app does pretty much the same thing, no need to explain more.

        There’s more that do the same DNS-based blocking, Netguard being another popular one.

        Another option would be to have a blocker running network-wide, a pihole for example. But again, won’t do anything in case you’re using a VPN, obviously.

        And then some apps will straight up refuse to run if you block their trackers. If this happens, it should be the last straw when deciding whether to actually keep the app or not.