• AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s easy to say, but what can they actually do that provides a better service than piracy at this point? They can’t compete on price, number of shows, or quality of shows with piracy by a long shot. They can potentially provide a better ease of experience with quick downloads and casting, but they already have that and I don’t know that it can get any better.

    As a general rule, I’d assume more piracy means less money into an industry, and less money in means fewer and less risky products that appeal to the lowest common denominator.

    • mkhoury@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s lots they can do…

      • cheaper prices (by lowering the % of rent-seeking),
      • better pay distribution for creators (Especially so that I pay to support the shows I watch rather than a global pool),
      • interoperability (to allow new businesses which provide frontends to multiple streaming services),
      • social (clipping and sharing, group watching, etc)
      • more equal promotion of shows/movies (instead of based on royalty rates)
      • AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I already said, they can’t compete on price. Cheaper prices will always be more than free. Same with interoperability, if you have the actual file you can run on anything. Group watching already exists.

        More equal promotion of shows/movies and pay distribution don’t actually help make the experience better for the consumer, that’s more relying on the consumer behaving ethically and that they believe piracy is wrong. It only helps for the people who think it was only sometimes wrong, which I don’t think is a huge group (although they are certainly the most vocal supporters of piracy)