minimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square245fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down143
arrow-up1585arrow-down1imageBusinesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then...lemmy.worldminimar@lemmy.world to Malicious Compliance@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square245fedilink
minus-squarevortic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoMoney is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
minus-square🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago money is speech, right? I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.
minus-squaremeteotsunami@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoBold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoI mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.
Money is speech, right? Does that make the ramifications of this decision go a lot farther? I don’t see how yet, but it seems like this ruling may have broad impacts when people start getting creative with it…
I mean, they do say that “money talks” and last time I checked, talking is a form of speech.
Bold assuming the corrupted six ever used anything close to consistency to inform their rulings.
I mean, there’s one thing that’s pretty consistent: they’ll do whatever their wealthy backers want them to do.