Analysts have warned Windows 10 end of life plans could spark a global torrent of e-waste, with millions of devices expected to be scrapped in the coming years. 

Research from Canalys shows that up to 240 million PCs globally could be terminated as a result of the shift over to Windows 11, raising critical questions about device refreshes and the responsibility of vendors to extend life cycles.

    • navigatron@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      At EoL, corporate security tells the IT department to uninstall it.

      Windows works great because MS tapes it back together slightly faster than it falls apart.

      When EoL hits, those devices are either trashed, firewalled into oblivion, or assimilated into the kube.

        • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know someone who only just switched from XP to 10. They literally did it yesterday, after battling with 10 for a couple of months - eventually they relented and replaced the components that were simply too old to work with 10. They only upgraded they reached a point where too much of the software they relied upon ceased being compatible with XP. Technically their 15 year old graphics card is now unnecessary landfill, since it was working and my friend didn’t want to stop using it - but I’m not sure I’d say a graphics card that has been in continuous use for so long could really be considered “wasted” even if it was still functional at the time of disposal.

          Seems to me that the problem of working computers (and individual components) going to waste while still being usable, due to changes in software requiring changes in OS is not new. The only way to prevent it would be to ban all further development of both hardware and software, so that hardware never becomes out of date.

          • nackmack@plesiosaur.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            @frog @MJBrune I don’t think we need to ban development, I think we need to resume focus on optimization so that things like a chat app don’t take up 1+ GB of RAM for example. If the operating system can still fit in old hardware’s specs, then unless someone is trying to do a task that is demanding for the currently available hardware (and it sounds like 15yo graphics card ain’t in that demographic) then it should largely be a case of update operating system, grab new versions of programs, and be about your day.

        • senseamidmadness@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say that, but just like with XP, Microsoft announced a paid subscription to Windows 10 security updates for up to 3 years after the EOL date. There are probably a good number of companies who haven’t switched yet or will not be able to switch easily.

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes being pedantic is easy. Did you have a point? What does nvidia’s failings have to do with anything? Pull that garbage out, drop in linux mint and donate it to a poor kid that needs it for school.

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      minecraft works without problems on linux and there is, libre office, only office and hell even google docs on linux. and fortnite is one of the few games that don’t work on linux because of the anti cheat that normally supports linux but doesn’t spesifically on fortnite because epic hates linux