• frog 🐸@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope, I think they would still be right. No matter what, a baby’s shit-covered arse doesn’t belong on a table in a restaurant. That’s just gross.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly right, it doesn’t.

      Which is why the owners are responsible for providing the safe clean place for them.

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Making the other customers suffer, and potentially get ill, isn’t a reasonable response to a business doing something shitty. Just don’t go to restaurants that don’t provide baby-changing facilities. Don’t expose innocent people to your baby’s shit.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Collateral damage in a just war. Don’t patronize restaurants that charge for the restroom and you’re in the clear there, while also being on the morally correct side of history.

              • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I don’t patronise restaurants that charge for toilet use. But that doesn’t put me on the side of parents who put their baby’s shitty arse on tables where people eat. Both sides of this “war” are shitty people that I want nothing to do with.