I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn’t even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn’t even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Because it relying entirely on the dominance of the iPhone isn’t really a post-Jobs action. It’s actually the exact opposite: relying entirely on something he captained in order to make sales.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      By this definition, everything that Apple do will count as relying on the dominance of the iphones because how tight their integration between their products is.