• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Religion teaches and reinforces bigoted and anti-science views, generally. Yes, there are good people that reject this basis of their religion, but religion itself has done far more harm than good.

    • fastandcurious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Please provide sources for your claims, what religion you want to believe in is a different topic, read the books of all the major religions and see how many and which one of them is ‘bigoted’ and ‘Anti-Scientific’

      If you are not gonna do that, atleast not fire such claims because you yourself don’t have the knowledge.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        All major religions reject science by asserting the baseless claim of divinity. They propose a foundational divine, without any proof. This is anti-science.

        As for being bigoted, quick examples are Christianity and the other Abrahamic religions supporting homophobia, transphobia, sexism, strong gender roles, and more.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re putting words in my mouth, lmao. I explicitly separated Religious people from Religion itself, and you’re tying them together as slander.

        Religion has done more harm than good as it has been the foundation of racism, homophobia, sexism, transphobia, rejection of science such as Evolution, and more. Religious people can be good, and have done good things, but Religion itself is harmful.

        I respect people’s rights to practice, but I don’t respect Religious people using religion as justification for anything bigoted, anti-science, or generally harmful.

        • Haagel@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The audacity of claiming that religious adherents are uniquely racist!

          Racism is literally the foundation of Darwinism, as explicitly stated by Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the DNA double helix.

          It’s right there in the title of Darwin’s book: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life

          It’s human nature to fight each other, and the tendency towards extremism is universal.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I did not claim religious people were uniquely racist, only that religion supports and reinforces racism. Kindly refrain from putting words in my mouth and actually answer my actual points.

            Human Nature is a naturalistic fallacy, and is a way to avoid actually addressing whether or not religion assists and reinforces racism or not.

            • Haagel@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              11 months ago

              You said it’s the foundation of racism.

              foundation noun foun·​da·​tion 1 : the act of founding here since the foundation of the school 2 : a basis (such as a tenet, principle, or axiom) upon which something stands or is supported the foundations of geometry the rumor is without foundation in fact

              Technical arguments don’t change the fact that Darwinism is inherently racist.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s certainly not the only foundation, but it is a foundation.

                Darwinism is not inherently racist, race isn’t even real, it’s a social construct. You’ve been doing Nazi apologia, intentionally or not, by attempting to tie Hitler to actual, sound science, and pretending the science must be bad.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    On the contrary, this entire convo you’ve been diligently trying to claim I was saying something I wasn’t, then mouth off about how Darwinism is racist because the Nazis cited Darwinism as justification. You’re dedicated to deliberately misinterpreting and derailing all conversations here.