I’d expected this but it still sucks.

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Maybe I’m just doing it wrong. I’ve just found LXD to be lacking as you can’t live transfer it to a different host. It is also slower than Docker and Podman and I was unable to get docker running in a unprivileged LXC container. I think it should be possible to run docker in LXC but by the time I spend the effort is is more secure and easier to use a full virtual machine.

              Maybe I should revisit the idea though as it seems like many people stand by it.

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            He should really switch to LXD/Incus, not Proxmox as it will end like ESXi one day.

              • TCB13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

                Here’s one of my older LXD nodes running HA:

                It’s “so hard” to run HA under LXD… you just have to download the official HA OS image and import to LXD.

                • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

                  I hear that I lot of people are using LXC. Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

                  • TCB13@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

                    Oh, my bad then. But yes, like Proxmox, LXD/Incus can do live migrations of VMs since 4.20 (2021 I believe). Live migration of containers can be done under specific circunstantes as well.

                    Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

                    In some of them yes. At least under Debian as long as you’ve set security.nesting=true it will work fine.