I’d expected this but it still sucks.

  • TheHolm@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    All of them not equate in same league. Do you know any type 1 free supervises out there? Xen probably.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Proxmox, Xen, hyper-v are all considered type 1 as far as I’m aware.

    • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, you’re right. I’m not sure if anyone would run Proxmox for their enterprise hypervisor? I mean HyperV is okay. Slim pickings for big orgs. I know there’s Nutanix, but most folks are moving to the big three for VMs and hosting.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I assume what you’re looking for specifically here is a complete platform that you can install on bare-metal, not just the actual hypervisor itself. In which case consider any of these:

      • Proxmox
      • XCP-NG
      • Windows Hyper-V Server Core (basically Windows Server Nano with Hyper-V)
      • Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding
      • Anarch157a@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Any Linux distro running KVM/QEMU - Add Cockpit if you need a web interface, or use Virt-Manager, either directly or over X-forwarding

        No need for X forwarding, you can connect Virt-Manager to a remote system that has libvirt,