• kalkulat@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    IMO owning an unoccupied house thats off-market, or prohibitively-priced is probably a gambling chip.

    IF there are ANY families in the same county that are homeless, it should begin being taxed as a gambling-chip. Sell-it very soon or it may used for a free shelter for however it remains unoccupied by the owner.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have no issues with raising property taxes on non-owner occupied housing, and having them even higher on unoccupied housing.