• _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m gonna assume you’re not from the US given your lemmy instance. In the US most police radios transmit “in the clear”, i.e., not encrypted. As such, anyone can buy a “police scanner”, or a radio on the same band as police/first-responder frequencies.

      In the internet age, there’s websites (and apparently apps now too), that physically monitor these radio channels and stream them online. Hence, a “police scanner app”. Hope that helps.

      Having typed all that out, the only thing I ask is to let us know where you’re from, please.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        In the US most police radios transmit “in the clear”, i.e., not encrypted

        That’s wild. Where I’m from (western Europe) the police may be using an encryption protocol riddled with backdoors (TETRA, though the “governments the West likes” protocol is much safer than the “open for anyone” version), but at least it’s encrypted enough that you’ll need some serious compute power to listen in on the police, barring software bugs in sender/receiver.

        You you know if there is a reason your police force allows criminals to listen in on police communication? Or do they simply not care? With all the money your police force seems to spend on big trucks and big guns, you’d expect an encrypted radio would fit inside the budget…

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Some time ago some American politician used the phrase unironically. Most speculated they were referring to Latin American countries, but since the politician was a republican and correcting themselves is anathema, we’ll never know.

            Anyway, it’s become a favorite of mine to repeat this, tongue in cheek.

      • PatMustard@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You assume correctly, UK. Seems kind of crazy, but the other reply chain explains it.