• onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nah, I’m allergic to clickbait. If it had a better, more serious title, I’d read it.

    If you’re the author of the article, you have to find that line between interesting and clickbait. Sensationalist titles like that are like smearing a distasteful substance on the cover of a book. No matter what you write in that book, I’m not picking it up.

    Possible titles (without even reading the article) that would make me click with an open mind

    • Threats to the open web
    • How much has the web changed since $date?
    • Where does the web go after $event?
    • The future of the web - an opinion
    • How do monopolies affect the internet?

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s more like it, this is a discussion that people can actually interact with! I am not the author, and I agree with you that the title isn’t great, but I am interested in discussing what they wrote and appreciate that you’ve now at least opened the door to a discussion on clickbait titles rather than just leaving a one sentence “gotcha”.

    • fluffyb@lemmy.fluffyb.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I would not have clicked if it had any of those titles. And I do actually agree with the title. We are watching the death of the internet. It will never be again what it was. And what it is now is a clean white washed drip fed version of the expansive and deep knowledge of everything that it once was.