• jackpot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    i think they mean ‘man’ as in ‘mankind’. also any ideas why would they carve it into bone and not bark or something more flat?

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Likely durability. A bone and a stick can both be thrown into a bag and carried with you, but a bone is much more durable than a stick. It’ll be less likely to break or wear down as it rubs against everything else in your bag.

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s exactly what is meant, but they have to find something to complain about

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Sure, you can say “man” means “mankind”, but when you use gendered language like that, most people picture a couple of caveMEN sitting around a fire carving bones rather than caveHUMANS (edited – I think it would benefit us to picture all genders around this hypothetical fire). Even though we try to use gendered language in a neutral way, listeners will often perceive the language in a gendered way.

    • Rowan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Likely durability and portability. Think of it as something they use month over month and just mark the day with something like a string band. Bone would be light enough to keep with you, strong enough to not break, and common enough to be available for household use.