Prowlarr returns There was an error loading this page when I click on an app and other sites. When I disable proton pass, it works as usual. Any idea how to solve it?

Permission denied to access property "matches"
  at toArray( (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:8:26)
  at toArray( (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:7:59)
  at parents.reduce(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:22:64)
  at parents.reduce(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/tabUtils.js:20:19)
  at getAllTabbableNodes (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/utils/DOMutils.js:31:43)
  at getAllTabbableNodes (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/focusMerge.js:37:41)
  at setFocus (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/focus-lock/dist/es2015/setFocus.js:21:34)
  at withinHost (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-focus-lock/dist/es2015/Trap.js:125:23)
  at lastTrap.returnFocus (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-focus-lock/dist/es2015/Trap.js:260:4)
  at reducePropsToState(mountedInstances.map(function (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-clientside-effect/lib/index.es.js:34:6)
  at componentDidUpdate (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-clientside-effect/lib/index.es.js:57:8)
  at Yi (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:219:501)
  at try{for (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:259:159)
  at unstable_next (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.production.min.js:18:342)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:324)
  at Uj (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:252:281)
  at Lj (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:243:370)
  at jg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:123:114)
  at unstable_next (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/scheduler/cjs/scheduler.production.min.js:18:342)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:324)
  at jg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:123:63)
  at eg (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:122:427)
  at Hb (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:292:100)
  at $c (webpack://prowlarr/node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.min.js:73:354)
    • Alk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Does bitwarden allow me to automatically create a new randomized email address for every new saved login I create, that forwards to my secret main address? That’s the main thing that’s keeping me with Proton. Every online account is a different email. When I start getting spam because one leaked, I simply delete that email address, problem solved. Something like the Gmail plus thing doesn’t work since I can’t arbitrarily delete an alias that way when I want to.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I have a domain with a catchall email address and just make up something random myself every time I’m signing up for a new site.

        • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          From looking over that page, it looks like they explain how to use such aliases, but don’t provide an alias service themselves, which it looks like Proton Pass does.

            • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Someone said

              Does bitwarden allow me to automatically create a new randomized email address for every new saved login

              And I’m questioning that based on the page in the “yes” link reply, suggesting that the provided page is not evidence that they do.

              I don’t follow how your reply relates to that.