• ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    And you dont see how voting for the “lesser evil” allows both parties to move further and further right? I was actually taken aback by how blatant you were in your steps, most liberals dont state it so directly.

    I’m gonna assume(hope) you think American foreign policy is bad real quick. Biden is complicit in a genocide, like an actual child killing, people starving, oppressor disguising bombs as canned food genocide. Sure trump is hypothetically worse, but by voting for biden you are showing the democratic party that you are willing to vote for someone who is actually genocidal. You are showing them that they can commit genocide when it benefits them and you’ll still vote for them. Of course this isn’t the only incredibly horrific thing the american establishment does that neither party budges on and the american populace just accepts. It’s just the worst and most obvious at the moment.

    Always remember that Germany voted for Hindenburg

        • Alue42@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You’ve admitted that you are young and haven’t been around for large scale issues and deep seated treaties and ally-ships that lead to the development of global political issues. It is incredibly understandable that given your age and experience you’ve summed up your decision into what you’ve currently seen in the news and perhaps the few bullet-point-history issues you’ve read up on.

          The issues going on with Israel are enormously complex and are not as simple as who’s land it is, who is keeping who away, and who is committing genocide. Yes, it is horrible, and it would be ideal if our political leader could step up and call out that country for those actions. The unfortunate reality from a geopolitical perspective and from the strategic perspective of being a world leader that needs to think many, many steps ahead is that the middle east is a very hostile area, and Israel is very strategically placed to not only have an ally, but also to keep key ports open - both for economic and military reasons.

          Making a statement against the actions of Israel would have been detrimental to future global peace options. Instead, Biden can work with Netanyahu behind the scenes without making an official statement.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your mistake is thinking Trump would stop the war in Gaza, and not end the war in Ukraine in the worst possible manner, by giving Putin everything he needs to exterminate the Ukrainians.

      You really need to pay better attention to what’s going on. I’m embarrassed for you here.

    • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Why do you target Biden though? If you ever voted before, chances are the candidate you voted for had the same complicit stance with Isreal. Is this really how you fix it?

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I haven’t voted in a presidential election before (in my early 20s), however if i had i would wish that i didn’t. I target biden becuase he is currently arming and aiding fascists.

        As for fixing the israel issue; i’m hoping, praying that democrats see the threat of being unelectable due to their complicity as more important than aiding a genocide. If biden ended his support of israel i’d actually vote for him. I dont have much else i like about him, many things i really dislike about him even, but thats normal for US presidential candidates. Its the genocide that pushed me over the edge, i cant budge on that.

        If you meant fixing US politics then I would say that is not possible without radical change of our current political system.

        • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Doesn’t this boil down to what-about-ism then, if we we denounce our state as fascist when in the case of our neighbors, while holding our grievance against state for the crimes against the population as a whole. Lesser or greater evil means our democratic voice is used against those that would lead us into darker times still rather than try to facilitate trust. I’m just saying it’s a silly self-defeating manipulation acting out without regard to trust.

    • bobburger@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      And you dont see how voting for the “lesser evil” allows both parties to move further and further right?

      I see a lot of people who aren’t voting using this logic and I don’t really understand it.

      If there are some number of candidates running, and the most left wing candidate wins each time, how does that push the country to the right?

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The rich benefit most from politically right policies and the rich are our governing body. If you vote for the most left candidate no matter how far on the right they realistically are then they will just continue to move right because thats what benefits them. I imagine part of your problem is that maybe you view the democratic party as left? It is not, both american political parties are on the right, one is just a little more left than the other. Let me know if this makes sense, i did a lot of work today and my brain is a little fried so im not sure how well i explained that.

    • AlmightyTritan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Idk maybe it’s cause I don’t live in as much of a two party system as the US, but essentially still a two party system.

      I think there’s value in strategic voting. I don’t know what the equivalent would be in the US but strategic voting for the lesser of two evils at a national level and then voting more true to your convictions at a municipal and provincial level is still valid.

      Again my opinions probably don’t work in the US electoral system, but voter apathy is a big part of how rights get eroded where I’m from. A party or political figure stays in power because of apathy and then they just keep getting away with shit. At least if you cast a vote it can be seen as you participating in the democracy.

      I will say there is something to the act of not voting as being a part of democracy, but truly I think along with abstaining any functioning democracy needs a “none” option.