• Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been tempted for the last year to begin work on designing an experience like IRC, but which includes voice chat and screen sharing capabilities. That’s my dream is a melding of a nostalgic chat protocol, with modern services.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      From my understanding IRC’s biggest flaw is that it requires the recipient to be online in order to receive messages, and any software that includes voice, video, screen sharing, and proper servers would by necessity have very little resemblance to it.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I suppose I mean the resemblance to IRC would be mostly in the user experience. However, I personally don’t want to add persisted server-side messaging either. The novelty for me is that it’s a “here, now” social experience.

        • Sonori@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The problem with non-persistent messaging is that for most things people use Discord for it is a non-starter. Most people who are doing more than just socializing really don’t want to spend half their time repeating things to people who were at work, asleep, or in a different time zone when the discussion came it. Any serious Discord competitor would need to focus on practically and low barriers to entery, which tend to be directly opposed to novelty.

          • MostlyBlindGamer@rblind.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or “How Signal is closer in functionality to WhatsApp by the day, because it turns out people like the functionality of WhatsApp.”