Isn’t that a prerequisite for enshitification? Publicly-traded companies are required (by law, I think) to maximize profits for their shareholders, even if that means utterly ruining their original product (Reddit, Boeing, etc.), yes? What do you think?

    • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      They may not have to maximise profits but the shareholders will question every decision that doesn’t maximise profits so the result is the same. That’s why activist investors that push companies to more ethical behaviour are important.

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They may not have to maximise profits but the shareholders will question every decision that doesn’t maximise profits so the result is the same.

        If that were true, we wouldn’t see the obscene salaries of C-suite level execs skyrocket… That money cuts into the profits as well, you know?

        They are ok squeezing their workers while giving themselves the sweet life on the company’s dime

        That’s why activist investors that push companies to more ethical behaviour are important.

        This is a fairy tale force, like Santa or the boogie man. You’ll never get ethical behavior from profit seeking entities

      • burningmatches@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, but we’ve had countless examples of loss-making tech companies with sky-high valuations. Amazon didn’t make a profit for something like 20 years. Investors of course want returns, but they can differ on the timeframe they’re willing to wait for them.