• HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Were Nazis allowed to deliberately ‘run rampant’ on Twitter pre-Elon? That’s a hot take.

    Musk’s buying Twitter had nothing to do with it being ‘monetised’ as far as I see. Musk just offered such a stupidly large amount that the board had to say ‘OK, sure.’

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They absolutely were, without question. That said, there’s nothing this guy can do to make that happen on Mastodon instances he doesn’t own.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just a quick reminder that Twitter was banning 10s of thousands of accounts of extremists that breached its terms of service, including a certain ex president of the US. It was imperfect, but ‘running rampant’ is a stretch

        • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          How many times did Trump show his true colors before getting banned? Twitter’s moderation policies were better pre-Musk but they were far FAR from acceptable.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It seems like we agree on the facts, and I certainly won’t disagree that it’s worse now, but I would characterize Twitter’s (pre-Musk) response to extremism as “measured, lacking and lethargic”, before I would use “imperfect”, which still implies “pretty good” and from my perceptive it was not good enough to make me want to use it. I think maybe we just have a different tolerance for hate speech.