• Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    I refuse to use discord, it is basically malware. Selfhosting is the only way, and TS3 works great for that.

        • Lemmy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          If you can’t audit the source code of the program, how do you know if TeamSpeak isn’t malware?

          • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not everything has to be foss, it is in company’s best interest to not make it as malware. In last 20 years that I have had TS installed on my server and client, have I had it act like malware. Discord in the other hand has instantly caused issues. Not saying that TS3 doesn’t have had bugs, ofc it has had.

            • Lemmy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              So you’re just trusting them to not do anything bad?

              • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                I know that discord is doing bad shit, so yes.

                How often you read the source codes of your tool?

                • Lemmy@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I may not read the source code of every tool I use, but even if the average user doesn’t read the source code, having it available for inspection by others in the community increases security, trust, and overall software quality. All a user really has to do is look at the license of the software they use, typically a GPL or similar license, and consider how reputable it is. Not only that, but if you’re on Linux already, you can just get most of the software from your distro’s repositories.

                  • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    So no closed source commerical product should ever exist? Discord is one too, I am just selecting one that I can control.

      • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        Huge RAM usage, wierd crashes, causes random lag in games, constant enshittification on-going. No thanks.

        • cobra89@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lol wut, they never claimed servers were independently controlled. Maybe you just didn’t look into what you were signing up for.

          When you go use different servers on Minecraft realms are you under any impression those are not controlled by Microsoft?

          When you choose a different server on World of Warcraft do you think it’s a non-blizzard server?..

          Like just because you put yourself into a state of bad false assumptions didn’t mean they tried to trick you. People have been saying this about discord from the beginning you just never cared to look.

          Did you actually think this or are you just inventing a person in your mind that this has happened to? Lol

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’re called servers in the UI though. Also, confusingly, there is a new feature coming called guilds.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re called direct messages, not private messages. They’re not tricking anyone into thinking anything lmao

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, but the entire point of renaming Private Messages to Direct Messages was exclusively so people would have the mindset you do.

            • odelik@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Umm… People have been using the phrase “Direct message (DM) me” since forever in the game and online comms world. Private message wasn’t a concept until after DMs were later encrypted. And we always knew, that if we didn’t control the servers, even encrypted, those messages were subject the server operators.

              Your logic is giving me the impression that you’re younger and didn’t go through these experiences.

              • Zoot@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Actually I am not younger, DM’s had always been Private Messages to me up until Facebook/MySpace and more people began flocking to the internet.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                No, the term PM has been around before DM was the norm. Forums generally used the term PM. Ironically, not remembering PMs being the term prior to DM is making me think you’re younger for not remembering it.

                • odelik@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’re right. Had to dig into my memory for this one and fact check myself.

                  IRC, BBS, and most forums (of the era) used PM or SP. MUCKs and a few other tools used Whisper. ICQ introduced “IM me”. Part of me remebers using the term “DM” for IRC messages, but I used IRC fairly regularly well into the 2010s.

                  However, the forum I spent a ton of my younger years on used “Direct Messages” which has likely polluted my memory. Since it was a technology related forum, that was probabaly a customization from the operator to distance everyone from the idea of “private” since everything was clear-text and unencrypted back then. That or I’m confusing “IM me” from the ICQ/AIM/MSN days.

                  Point being, nobody thought “PM” meant secure and not visible to the server operators back then. It just meant that only you, the recipient, server operators, and 1337 h4xx0rz could see your messages.

                  What a trip down edited memory lane that was. Thanks for fact checking me.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I have never been under the impression PMs were unreadable by the people operating the service I send them on.

              • Zoot@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Neither have I. Generally if I want the impression of it being private, it will need to be encrypted and a whole skew of other criteria comes in. Still doesn’t change the fact that growing up they were referred to as “PM’s” for the first half of my life.