-modified the original reddit link to point to a privacy frontend-

Now that the change is in place, there is no more login on old. reddit. com

Reddit is getting worse

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Right, but the reason why you employ an agile software development model in the first place is because you want to make money fast. The slow waterfall development models don’t really lend themselves to fast bucks, do they.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The project management approach does not dictate the feature priority. The business dictates the priority. Project management is just a tool

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The project management approach does not dictate the feature priority.

        No, but it does affect development speed.

        • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          what relevance would that have over the time span discussed here?

          And no, whatever you read about agile, the development speed comes down to people not to procedure. That’s true even if we disregard the fact that very few companies claiming to use agile actually understand what agile is

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well you seem very sure of yourself so everything you say must be correct. Whatever I read is false, whatever I’ve experienced myself is false, gonna take this dude’s word for it. ✔️

            Agile is of course a tool, and you use it to achieve your goals. And of course it comes down to the people using it. Just like a hammer is useless to a centipede. I’m just saying, I’m comparing agile to waterfall as the only changing variable factor.

            Like how deep can you nitpick this.

            • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              you’re attributing a state of fact to a cause that has nothing to do with it. I’m not nitpicking, i’m pointing out a fallacy: the effect doesn’t prove the cause, it only works the other way around

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m not attributing it as a sole factor, like I said. Not a sole factor. Not a sole factor. I hope it sinks in now. Not a sole factor.

                • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, a contributing factor for sure. Just like whatever company produced the pencils used by Einstein was a contributing factor to the theory of relativity. Not a sole factor. No, not a sole factor but a factor. Yes

                  • Victor@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I don’t think it’s that insignificant of a factor but you’ll believe what you believe and I’ll believe what I believe. 👍 Not an issue. 🙂