• Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      If by “principals” you mean “banning anybody who falls outside of the groupthink”, then sure, more power to ya.

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          1, that’s whataboutism, form a better argument. 2, that’s still a weak “principal” to have and defending it as though it’s a good thing is pretty cringe.

          • beardown@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            .world is a zionist and CIA-affiliated shillstorm. It’s just the US version of .ml

            Both are equally bad because the US and China are equally bad. Don’t believe me? Check out the death toll of Native American genocide, transatlantic slavery, Latin american imperialism, CIA coups during the Cold War, police repression today, and current prison populations.

            Given that I have no idea why anyone would defend the United States. Unless you’re brainwashed or working for the CIA

            • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              i’m open to the possibility that you’re right, but my experience is that criticism of the cia or zionism is tolerated to a much greater degree on .world than criticism of china or soviet russia is tolerated on .ml.

              can you point to specific instance-wide bannings for talking shit on us foreign policy or zionism?

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                It’s tolerated in different ways. Ostracization and orchestrated mass downvotes are used rather than bans. .world utilizes methods of control that are more subtle than .ml. Which is consistent with how the CIA/West exerts control compared to China.

                Our propaganda techniques and mechanisms of control are more multifaceted and less brutish and obvious - which isn’t a good thing. It means that we create a veil and drape it over the eyes of our people so that they don’t even realize that they are being controlled. This is the ideological state apparatus of the West that is drastically more effective than anything a socialist state has managed to create. Of course, we both have repressive state apparatuses as well, and our police are arguably more brutal than theirs (especially if you aren’t white and female), but there is less need to use that when you are able to brainwash your public so effectively with subtle acts of ideological correction. And convincing them that hundreds of strangers are mad at them is a good way to minimize dissent from being articulated in the first place, as well as distractions such as typical liberal rage bait and “red team bad” distractions

                • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  i think this is pretty hard to draw a direct comparison. first, a few mods/admins deciding to ban is not the same as hundreds of individuals voting. even if half of them are bots (no one games lemmy votes, though, do they?), that’s still a far cry from someone stepping in and actually silencing a user.

                  second, while i think you’re right about the nature of western societal control, i don’t think there is any conspiracy to enact that on .world. maybe i’m naive though.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Winnie the Pooh

        Isn’t this racist?

        Also, remind me about Kent State. Or Ferguson. Or the extermination of Native Americans. Or concentration camps in the Philippines.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Imagine trying to insult someone by calling them a liberal lmfao.

      Who remembers when China was doing live organ farming on people?

      Pepperidge farm fucking remembers.

      • AINeMyot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just FYI, the organ farming thing comes from Falun Gong, who are a weird cult that have been (perhaps overly) oppressed by the Chinese government. They have quite a strong media presence and some weird beliefs about organs.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          who are a weird cult that have been (perhaps overly) oppressed by the Chinese government. They have quite a strong media presence and some weird beliefs about organs.

          This logic doesn’t make sense. The government with a great firewall isn’t controlling media to restrict this one particular groups views? Even though they have no trouble with every other group?

          • AINeMyot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think it’s worth considering that your evidence comes directly from a country that considers China an adversary, and they seem to take the Falun Gong organ harvesting as fact.

            • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              True, however that doesn’t necessarily constitute falsehood in what they’re claiming.

              The UN also did work on this, as did Canada and some investigative reporters in Europe.

              China has lots of adversaries. Mainly anybody in the west, and they dominate any of their other Allies which makes them a de facto leader and would make criticism from anyone else pretty tough.

              Edit: oh and in 2015 China announced that they wouldn’t do forced organ transplants on prisoners anymore - so they were most definitely participating in this disgusting practice.

              https://www.scu.edu/ethics/healthcare-ethics-blog/forced-organ-harvesting-a-decades-long-injustice-in-need-of-international-accountability-and-action/

              • AINeMyot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                True, however that doesn’t necessarily constitute falsehood in what they’re claiming.

                I appreciate that, I just think it was worth pointing out that its worth being sceptical about a source like that, as you would be about one coming from the Chinese government.

                • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  100%

                  I’m critical of every ruling body, regardless of where I reside. There’s something to be said about having power over millions of people and how humans deal with that.

                  I’m especially critical of governments that are known to run PsyOps, disinformation campaigns, and known histories of abuse (US, China, Russia, Israel, Iran, North Korea, etc). Ultimately, the devil you know is better than the others, but we’re still working with devils