A controversy over a waterfall has cascaded into a social media storm in China, even prompting an explanation from the water body itself.

A hiker posted a video that showed the flow of water from Yuntai Mountain Waterfall - billed as China’s tallest uninterrupted waterfall - was coming from a pipe built high into the rock face.

The clip has been liked more than 70,000 times since it was first posted on Monday. Operators of the Yuntai tourism park said that they made the “small enhancement” during the dry season so visitors would feel that their trip had been worthwhile.

“The one about how I went through all the hardship to the source of Yuntai Waterfall only to see a pipe,” the caption of the video posted by user “Farisvov” reads.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes in the sense that all communist countries are state capitalism, no in the sense that it betrays the very ideology of communism.

          If you think about it it’s very much the same structure as a big business, with the “boss” at the very top, the party being the shareholders and executives swallowing all the profits and at the bottom are all the workers getting the shaft.

          The main differences with normal capitalism is that the state here has an army, police and a full monopoly, so the party can literally do whatever they want to whoever they want within China. They don’t play by the rules, they write the rules, ie, a capitalist wet dream.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            If every time comminism is tried, it turns into one specific bad thing, then wouldnt that mean that communism is inherently flawed?

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              True Communism has never been tried on a large scale. It’s always authoritarians calling themselves Communist.

              But yes, it is flawed in that humans are too tribal for it to work on a large scale.

              • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                6 months ago

                Did you really just a “not true communism”?

                I swear tankies are a meme.

                • samus12345@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  I thought tankies are the ones who like the “not true communisms” of authoritarian countries. It seems to be becoming a general “person I disagree with” term nowadays. Do they usually say Communism is flawed?

            • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I don’t think so, no. If anything it shows it’s difficult to achieve.

            • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Ignoring whatever semantic arguments about socialism and communism, it’s easier to just point out that statement isn’t true.

              Employee-owned businesses are socialist - in the actual definition of socialism where capital is owned by the workers. They work fine, maybe even better than capitalist businesses.

              Fire departments are socialist - in a slightly different definition where a non-capital resource is owned by a community. They definitely work better than the capitalist versions that used to exist.

              The problem with saying anything communist always fails is that they only call it communism when it fails. When it succeeds they just call it something else.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Not necessarily, it could just mean that the vast majority of the time it would be legitimately implemented, a larger country that doesn’t like communism spends a lot of time and money interfering with it

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I wonder if there’s a reason why I said “the vast majority” and “legitimately implemented”

                  Nah I’m sure I only picked those words because they sound nice

                  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    If you cant survive with the support of china behind you, your system is shit

            • skulblaka@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              If every time someone is born, they die, then wouldn’t that mean that life is inherently worthless?

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      There is a vast resource of nearly all of humanity’s collective knowledge that you can tap to learn why a govt doing something doesn’t mean it’s not capitalism.

      • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        What gets me about the mentality is that they blame capitalism for everything they don’t like and somehow imagine that none of those things would exist in a different system - it feels like they’ve never really thought about the reality of any other system.

        Why would people living under true real communism not want a pretty waterfall? Do workers stop wanting a nice day out when their employer is state run?

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The planet is literally on fire directly caused by capitalism.

        The housing crisis is because houses are seen as an investment vehicle instead of a basic human right.

        The inflation is caused by corporations squeezing the population as much as they can to get every little cent they can.

        Everything capitalism touch withers. There isn’t much new innovation anymore, just mega corpos buying other companies to stop the competition and lock the market.