• OR3X@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I believe they created it before tap really took off in the US so scan was a better option for them at the time.

    • DarthYoshiBoy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tap to pay was pretty well established when they went with scan to pay, they just hoped the Walmart name was large enough that they could cut out all the middlemen inherent with traditional payment processors and keep a bigger piece of the pie. Specifically they were in a spat with Visa over merchant fees at the time so they wanted an option that allowed them to cut Visa out of the picture. They thought that having their own scan to pay system would allow them to do that, but they eventually reconciled with Visa and got the merchant fees discount they wanted and that aspect of the scan to pay system sorta dropped out of focus.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Hmm. They might have gotten that discount because of using their alternate payment system as leverage, so might have been worthwhile.