The difference between the two security features is that Safe Browsing will compare a visited site to a locally stored list of domains, compared to Enhanced Safe Browser, which will check if a site is malicious in real-time against Google’s cloud services.
While it may seem like Enhanced Safe Browsing is the better way to go, there is a slight trade-off in privacy, as Chrome and Gmail will share URLs with Google to check if they are malicious and temporarily associate this information with your signed-in Google account.
But Google is already analyzing all emails received. So the only difference is that they actually know which links have been clicked.
The privacy issue is Gmail, not that particular feature.
I forwarded all my gmail addresses to proton recently. I’m very pleased! It works a lot better than gmail-to-gmail forwarding and the UI is purple! Purple!!
I was just going to leave a link to proton. Nice.
Proton has been great and I recently found out that I get free access to simplelogin.io for email masking with my proton account.
I’m actually quite fond of Chrome (don’t shoot me) 😕 Is it “better” to use Chromium?
On Android I just started using kiwi browser a month or two ago it’s for android only but it’s chromium based and supports extensions which brings ublock and others to mobile.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kiwibrowser.browser
Thanks for the suggestion!
I had a look, and must admit it sets my spidey sense in something of a tingle 🤔
Their website says “© 2019 - 2021”, and the blog has a single post from 2019. Similarly, the knowledge base has one single post.
Similarly, their GitHub doesn’t seem to have had any changes in the /src project, although this might be because they’ve moved development to /src.next.
Actually, looking at /src.next, there does seem to be a lot of activity, with issues being closed regularly. Maybe it’s just the classic case of devs focusing on dev work and not outward communication or site maintenance.
I’ll give it a go at some point and see how it feels 👍
There is also Cromite.
Simply, yes.
there is a slight trade-off in privacy, as Chrome and Gmail will share URLs with Google to check if they are malicious and temporarily associate this information with your signed-in Google account.
Yeah just a slight trade-off of sending Google every URL you visit.
Yeah, such a weird editorialization - it’s a huge trade-off, making such a feature completely unacceptable for me personally.
The last opt-in feature they introduced would send them your password in certain cases ☹️
Chrome’s ‘Enhanced Spellcheck’ and Edge’s ‘Microsoft Editor’ are exclusively opt-in add-ons that users must explicitly authorize, and while it’s made clear that your data will be sent back to both companies to improve the products, it’s not so obvious that this could include your personally identifiable information (PII).
https://www.techradar.com/news/your-browser-spellchecker-could-be-leaking-your-passwords
I still get nagged constantly to add a birthday to my Google account to make sure I am older than 13 or something… To satisfy some dumb law I think. The email account is like 15 years old though. How could I be under 13 if it’s that old?
Don’t use Gmail or Chrome
Funny how Firefox can be at least as secure without it having to phone home every time you click on a link.
Usually when this happens, we call it spyware, nuke it from orbit, and find an alternative.
firefox does utilize the lesser version of these google-provided services by default–how it works
Firefox downloads a database of URLs to block. It doesn’t send every URL you open to Google.
god, i hate this shit. i have a lot of stuffed tied to my google accounts but i think i’m at least going to switch email apps.
FairEmail has been the best one ive tried client wise and protonmail if you want to switch email providers completely
“As Chrome and Gmail will share the urls with Google”.
Chrome and Gmail are Google. You can replace this with “As Google and Google will share urls with Google” without any loss of accuracy.
deleted by creator
