The inner circle so to speak

  • darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    keepass > bitwarden

    vpn providers should be reviewed regularly

    email is inherintly insecure/non-private, self hosted is best

    • ArcticLynx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      why do you prefer keepass to bitwarden? has it better privacy or is it just a personal preference because you like the UI more for example?

      • darcy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        keepass is a different paradigm. it uses a locally encrypted file. many frontends for it (use keepassxc and keepassdx). dont have to rely on some 3rd party, even if they say they have e2ee. theres no better privacy (and security) for an app than not using it with the internet. im not too concerned about ui for pw manager personally, the less time i spend w it unlocked the better. only (slight) problem for me: multi device usage (i just copy the file onto my phone occasionally). general rule of thumb: if it can be selfhosted, it is best to.

        i think bitwarden is the best one of its type, it comes down to your needs and threat model

        • ArcticLynx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I really like the cross device sync, even tho it’s a security risk of course. also, I don’t know anything about self hosting (might get into it when I got the time), so bitwarden might be the best pw manager for my requirements rn.

        • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can selfhost bitwarden, there’s also vaultwarden, an open bitearden api implementation. You could host this on an internal-only server. But you also can sync your single password file with a lot devices and use keepass, I just find that a bit annoying. You also cannot share some passwords with your relatives easily that way.

      • Rooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        its more user friendly. Just a file you have to have. You can encrypt that double and tripple on bitwarden nope.

    • Almace@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You do also kind of put all your eggs in one basket so to speak though. I don’t have anything against Proton and the pricing makes sense if you value all their services and pay for Ultimate (though by my estimate, less sense if you are only looking for a smaller handful of services). However, if you go fully into Proton for everything, you’re placing your trust into an entire stack of services and it can end up a single point of failure.

      • DogsAreEverywhere@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        However, if you go fully into Proton for everything, you’re placing your trust into an entire stack of services and it can end up a single point of failure.

        Yeah, I know

        The point is that Proton offers good service at a reasonable price, and for me that’s it, that’s perfectly fine

  • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Had anyone heard of or tried buttercup? Any thoughts?

    I was mulling around the idea of using KeePass but it seems to be too inconvenient. The pretty UI and cool name makes me want to try buttercup.

    • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      KeePass + Syncthing is pretty convenient.

      Buttercup looks to be using AES-CBC with PBKDF2 and no authentication, but I only took a very brief look so I may have missed important details. That’s not secure if an attacker can alter the vault file, and PBKDF2 isn’t a great KDF to use. If you use this, you definitely need a 128-bit or higher entropy passphrase (10 Diceware words). You usually want that anyway, but using a weaker string for your master password will be less secure than you expect compared to something using a modern KDF.

      • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the insightful response. I’m gonna spend some time searching for all those terms you mentioned because much of it is stuff I’ve only heard in passing or never heard of at all. I’ll try to find what works well enough for me. Wish me luck!

    • twei@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tutanota is one of the few good E-Mail services that i can think of, what’s so terrible about tutanota?

      • WtfEvenIsExistence3️@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tutanota is in Germany, which is part of the 14 Eyes global surveillance network. Protonmail is located in Switzerland, not currently part of any such intelligence agreements. Switz courts are also much less willing to approve search warrants.

      • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The lock in and the lies. The first being your inability to read your emails in another client. Second is the lie that it’s secure when email is inherently not second. It’s making a false promise.

        Oh and I forgot the new issue, being that you can’t zoom mail, which is infuriating.

        Disclaimer: I pay for Tutanota and have for a few years. But I’m tired of it. Will switch to another season once K-9 becomes Thunderbird for Android

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a US consumer, I can’t use a lot of these VPNs. When you dig into how local governments are trying to break encryption in many countries overseas it makes you slow to sign up for services. The worst case would be you use a service, get invested and a few weeks later new legislation you’re not following/in the know about gets passed and some of your data is now in some foreign governments jurisdiction more so than it was before.

    It’s not that Germany or Sweden in particular do that today but I also haven’t quite looked into its bounds, if five-eyes alliance reaches them, etc. There is a lot you have to be cognizant of.

    Also I like Bitwarden but Vaultwarden is the way to go; just make sure to donate/pay somehow for bitwarden if you use its clients.

  • Qkall@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    bruh, i can’t be the only one confused why state farm’s drive safe app was being touted…

  • dzervas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    just a side note for everyone out there that uses bitwarden: you can reset your password with just your email. that means the admin can see your passwords. The only 3 upstream password managers that don’t have that “feature” are 1Password, lastpass and keypass (not counting gpg-based script in bash n friends). Lastpass is obviously a mediocre solution (too many breaches), keypass isn’t for everyone (UX). 1Password is a very solid solution and it has public security audits

    I’ve got nothing with agilebits/1Password - i just use it after spending days researching (also I’m a former IT security engineer)

    • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No you can’t reset your bitwarden master password with just an email. I invite you to try and let is know how it went.

    • biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If that were true that it wouldn’t be just a side note because it would render the whole Bitwarden product useless. It’d pretty much mean that they are not encrypting passwords at all, so even worse than infamous LastPass. But as the other comment pointed out, it’s pretty much not like that.

    • Waryle@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s so out of context it’s almost untrue.

      Bitwarden can’t find or change your password, and their admins absolutely can’t see them either.

      You’re talking about the “admin password reset” feature offered to organizations (and which doesn’t concern lambdas users at all), which must be explicitly activated and which allows admins not to see our password, but to trigger a password reset with notification to the user.

      Once the password has been reset, all you have to do is change it, and nobody else has access to it.

      https://bitwarden.com/help/forgot-master-password/

      https://bitwarden.com/help/account-recovery/

  • Mr_1077@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    For anyone still using Mullvad and wants port-forwarding, I recommend AzireVPN.

    Good list! I use all of them too.