• ebenixo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let’s conflate the prime thrust of the song with just the one line where he refers to food stamps and crucify him / not hold those sewing poverty and anxiety into society to account

    • Aaliyah1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lyrics are extremely basic and not creative in the slightest. They make gestures towards working class solidarity, but are petit bourgeois attitudes wrapped in redneck aesthetics for comfortable middle class folk. Songs like this are a dime a dozen, and I’m sure you can find another song like this, especially in country/bluegrass, without the racist undertones.

      • ebenixo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I don’t need the song I’m just pointing out how people are providing incompetent analysis like yourself

      • ebenixo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a populist song it’s got fuck all to do with race. Try thinking for yourself and stop being an apologist for corporatism. What you don’t like is the populism because you like being lap dog to corporations so you try to conflate anything populist with racism because you saw someone else do it and you are a follower.

        • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t say race. I said Confederacy. The lyrics continuously dogwhistle about the mason dixon line and the union / confederacy divide.

          Can it really be populist and anti-corporate if it repeats talking points from Raegan? And if it was almost certainly funded and put in front of us by a think tank?

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s because a lot of Americans are under the impression that poor people are poor because they’re lazy, and not because they’re victims of oppression. They even cling to this absurd belief when they themselves are the victims of similar oppression. Must be lead in the water or something…

    • gabe [he/him]@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an outcome of puritanical Protestantism in the modern day. It’s nicknamed prosperity theology. Lack of wealth is seen as a moral failure, rather than a societal one. To be wealthy is to be granted abundance by God, and to be poor is to be punished for misdeeds in the eyes of God. It’s a cruel ideal that is deeply embedded into right wing American religious spaces.

    • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve lived in very poor, rural, white American places, and it’s unironically all about skin color.

      White and poor? It’s because the Democrats illegally steal your money with taxes, and any welfare is just you getting back less than you deserve.

      Black and poor? It’s because you’re bad, and any welfare is the Democrats buying your vote and supporting you destroying the country with your violence.

  • ColorcodedResistor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    id be willing to wager a $20 he used A.I. software and tweaked it for these lyrics. everyone commenting has been skirting, what i think, to be just a new trend in bait music.

    The song is bad yet just cognitive enough to cause a stir.

  • ashok36@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck this bible thumpin reactionary hillbilly dork.

    “But he goes after both sides!”

    No, He punches down on poor people. Fuck off with that.

    • eric5949@lemmy.cloudaf.site
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The name of the song itself is a huuuuuggggge dog whistle, imo. Tells me everything I need to know about the target demographic.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How is that? I’d honestly like to know. It raises my hackles, but i can’t really explain why.

        “Rich men north of Richmond”… I’m not american, so maybe that’s why i don’t quite get it

    • rebul@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you punch down on poor people when you are living in a camper? His song is #1 on iTunes in the US/UK/Australia, #2 in Ireland and Canada. But it certainly couldn’t be because it resonates truth for the masses. No, it is because he is punching down on the poor and you are so smart to have figured it out. The few negative opinions I have seen about this song have been from people it is calling out. Tool.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fat shaming, welfare queening, both sidsing, slack jawed backwater hick bullshit. I grew up around dipshits just like him. 1, they’re hypocrites that live off the system and haven’t been able to see their own cock without the assistance of a mirror in 15 years but because they’re white it’s ok. 2, Their “color blindness” and concern trolling falls away behind closed doors. It’s empty platitudes and surface level enlightened centrist garbage and nothing more. He doesn’t mean a word of what he’s singing and the people that “resonate” with it don’t either. It’s just 4 minutes of dog-whistling and right wing propaganda.

        • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Mentioning weight isnt needed if we are talking about him being a shit human being

      • ssboomman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having something resonate with a bunch of people, and saying something true isn’t always the same thing. You can say a bunch of dumb bullshit about society that resonates with people but isn’t really true, just like how he does. You have just fallen for the grift. Get his dick out of your mouth.

      • Raise_a_glass@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been thinking a lot about this song. And it is a real feeling that people have.

        But it is also just whining.

        The way he goes from talking about people without anything to eat and then talks about how someone that poor and fat shouldn’t eat a fudge round just seems to be a confused message.

        Is big government the problem? Or is it lack of corporate regulations that then allow big companies to pay people less than what they need to survive.

        Washington can do things to fix what he is talking about, but I would be shocked if he is interested in any policy that helps poor people or people drowning in student or medical debt.

        • taigaman@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think he’s talking about people that have deliberately gotten themselves so fat that they get a disability check from the government for it. I definitely have a problem with where he’s placing the blame, but he’s talking about what he sees around him. I’m from an area similar to him, and the number of people trying to line themselves up for government assistance as their career is substantial. I think it speaks to the hopelessness of the area we live in these days, on top of generational poverty. Things have always been bad around here, but they got a lot worse after mining, and its supporting industries fell apart.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I doubt there’s more than five people who have deliberately gotten themselves into disability by getting themselves fat. It’s incredibly hard to get onto disability and “I am fat” doesn’t cut it, you have to be able to not move to have even a chance

            • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My mother is clinically diagnosed with a psychological disorder that caused hallucinations, anxiety and delusion. She tried to get disability for 30 years. She never got it even though she was institutionalized multiple times

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No one has “deliberately” gotten morbidly obese.

            I’m not absolving anyone of all personal responsibility for their body and what they put in it, but you should read about food deserts and similar. Many folks in this country ONLY have access to a McDonald’s and a gas station snack aisle.

      • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        he lives on 90 acres, he’s living in a camper as a choice because he thinks it’s fun and aesthetic. Both before and after this song came out he could afford a 5,000 sq. ft. home

      • Sunforged@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aw yes because punching down never resonates with the masses. We’ve never elected politicians who distract from real issues by blaming poor people who don’t use them bootstraps…

      • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you punch down on poor people when you are living in a camper?

        You can totally hate on poor people while being poor yourself. I’ve seen it loads of times. The mentality is “I deserve welfare, but those people don’t! They’re cheating the system!”

        The few negative opinions I have seen about this song have been from people it is calling out.

        Short, fat people?

      • Aaliyah1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Living in a camper…off the grid on 90 acres of land that he owns and plans to build a farmhouse and raise livestock on. Working class my ass…

      • Agent_of_Kayos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, because a group of people have never rallied up for something they believed is true but isn’t…wait…

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This song does such a good job with communicating the conservaive trinity:

    • persecution complex
    • mad about things they themselves voted for
    • mad that the other is getting something, which is obviously undeserved
  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone have the numbers of social welfare spending vs corporate welfare spending for a recent year? Say 2020-2022? I can’t find it.

    • Luccus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m too lazy to look up the numbers, but I think the premise of this argument is rather weak.

      Money spend on social welfare, vastly improves poor people’s lives. When you spend it on corporate welfare, the money tends to go into the pockets of people who are already pretty comfortable.

      This is a simplification of a multifaceted issue, but by and large I think this holds a lot more water than just comparing numbers.

      Also: There was a pandemic in the time period given, so there might be some selection bias.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Means testing is something that wastes a lot of public welfare funds and is usually a tool utilized by those who want to cut programs as an example of welfares inability to work. If we got rid of means testing then corporate welfare would be shown for how truly useless it is. I’m not arguing with you or anything, just adding some more detail to the topic

    • Cleverdawny@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It depends on what exactly you consider social welfare and corporate welfare. There’s all sorts of ways to split the data.

    • Bizarroland@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And unfortunately he’s also a pretty damn good singer.

      Like my hackles were up the whole time I was listening to the song because I knew this is some sort of like Republican redneck protest song against the liberals, but at the same time I had to admit the guy can fucking sing and it was a good song.

      We really need to step up our protest song game.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You could be mad at both… why is this a black and white issue? EBT abuse is real.

    I have seen people literally sell the milk they get from EBT that was intended to be used for their baby. They bragged about being able to get the new iphone with it. I have seen homeless who buy bottled water on SNAP only to dump and resell the bottles so they could get cash for their addictions. Why would i not be mad at that just as I am at how corporate bailouts didnt help anyone except the top .01% of society?

    Edit: so many hexbears. I dont care to respond to Kremlin bots.

  • young_broccoli@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Songs are not often literal. When he sings about the “obese” i think he means “the wealthy” and not literally fat people.

    • Tony Smehrik@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe, but he’s also using common talking points of conservatives who do literally believe fat people on SNAP benefits don’t deserve them.

  • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty funny that the expectation on any man who picks up a guitar these days is not that he has a decent voice to go with, it’s that his political ideology is “correct” and cohesive and that he makes sure to convey the entire thing in a 4 minute song.

    The people getting their knickers in twist over this song are lost.

            • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They’re dogwhistles. The parts about “the obese milkin welfare” and “taxes not ought to pay for your bags of fudge rounds.” Literally just Reagan era welfare queen rhetoric. If you don’t recognize those as racist dogwhistles you’ve been living under a rock for at least 40 years.

              But even if you don’t see the dogwhistles I hope you can understand how the song is punching down on poor people