• ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just gets worse when you use what developers call a two car garage now. 24x24 would be awesome, it’s more like 18x20 now despite bigger cars.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are in that bucket and in this stupid country there aren’t many smaller cars anymore. We’re looking for a decent EV that is small and would fit in our garage. I think we have like, 2 options. Everything out there is some crossover SUV bullshit. I don’t want a giant car, I just want something smaller and comfortable for 2 people.

  • ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sort of thing has always happened.

    I do find it particularly infuriating when it’s a topic I’m knowledgeable in/involves my profession. But then I remember most people are stupid and it doesn’t both me too much.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve had the “You don’t work in X do you?” or the “tell me you don’t know about X without telling me you don’t work in X”. Oh boy my fucking bachelors and masters and years of experience in the field say otherwise FFS!

      But then I remember most people are stupid and it doesn’t both me too much.

      Great mantra to live by.

        • Erk@cdda.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tbf I once looked seriously at a house with a giant garage because I wanted to turn it into a huge hobby and rpg space.

    • Rognaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Am I not supposed to like that? Cause I really like that house design. Garage for days.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        That looks amazing. I’d actually have space to work on a project car, plus store my daily, as well as extra storage, probably a server rack and a whole bunch of other stuff. One of the things I notice most about living in an apartment vs my childhood home is how much storage space we had in our garage.

  • Rukmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know the full context of this conversation, but is it normal for homes to have large garages? I live in a 620 sq foot house (way too small, I have only one kid), and no garage. I wouldn’t even want a garage, I have a driveway? Some of my neighbors have garages but they are not that large, they certainly don’t make up 50% of their space, but some of them 1/3rd, if their house is smaller. Most houses in my neighborhood are bigger than my house but not huge.

    • cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends where you live; large garages can be normal. Obviously not 60% of the space, but garages can seriously help protect vehicles and you from the elements. They’re great if you have severe winters, frequent rain, strong sunshine, and are now helpful for electric car charging.

      • Rukmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good point, we do have hail and tornados where I live. But I guess growing up poor we just accepted damage to vehicles. Not that I’m saying it’s ideal, just that I hadn’t really considered it an avoidable part of life.

        • cosmic_skillet@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t forget it helps deter thieves as well. Smash and grabs, catalytic converter thefts, etc. Also if you have other vehicles like bicycles/motorcycles then you’ll definitely want them inside a garage vs outside where they’re visible and more vulnerable.

          • Rukmer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My bikes and lawnmower are in a really small shed. I do wish we had a bigger shed though mainly because we have to stack the bikes on top of the lawnmower so it’s a big hassle with my wife and I both being disabled to unpack and repack the shed every time the grass needs cut. So a garage would help with that too. I guess I want a small garage now, you’ve sold me haha. Still can’t afford it though.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck /fuckcars

    They actually want to bulldoze so much, just so we can cram more people in closer together. And no, no one wants to be walking around when its 90+ degrees out, or literally freezing.

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “We should allow higher density and missing middle housing to be built and promote alternatives to cars” == “We want to bulldoze everything”?

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ive never seen any calls to bulldoze anything. We do a lot of complaining about how much was bulldozed to fill landscapes with stroads and parking lots. And dont act like we’re not calling for buses and trains as well. Have you stopped and thought about why it’s too hot to walk around now?

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ill give you the benefit of the doubt that you mean even if it was pre-global warming cooler it’d be too hot to walk. It’s still extended those periods where it’s too hot and cold to walk. Plus, again, we also call for buses and trains and trams for your air conditioned travel needs.

    • PlatinumPangolin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They throw out all nuance and have absolutely no empathy or consideration that others need to live differently than them. Or hell, need to live differently than them in order to support their own lifestyle. I swear 90% of them have never lived outside the city they were born in.

      • frenchyy94@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK so the majority of people has to cut back on so much, especially a safe environment to get places, just so a few people with a car fetish can keep buying bigger and bigger cars. Got it.

        • rexxit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We’re very quickly moving to a place where the QUANTITY of people is so high, the QUALITY of their lifestyles have to be sacrificed to cut down on human impact. The impoverished/developing world has very low impact, at huge cost to their quality of life. Who wants to volunteer to live like sub-saharan Africans, or Indians in abject poverty to cut down on human impact? I’m certain they don’t want that life - and why should they? I’m sure they would like to travel on a jet to a beach vacation like those in more affluent countries do.

          I’m calling this eco-austerity. Instead of publicizing overpopulation and promoting low birth rates, we’re expected to belt tighten and give up on quality of life. It’s bullshit. We should have <1B people living like kings, not 10B people living like peasants.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I generally agree with you about fuckcars. They’re sanctimonious assholes. But when it comes to housing, suburban sprawl is always bad.

    • mihnt@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they’re pretty much ACAB now but cars instead of cops.

      EDIT: Before anyone even says it. Bad cops suck. Cars do not suck. Big lifted trucks are ass. I wish I could make a 4 wheeler street legal.

        • mihnt@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I make a living out of my car, so in my case, I’ll just have to disagree.

          • MBM@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a good amount of drivers walked or took public transit/bikes instead, wouldn’t that make your job easier?

            • mihnt@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Of course, sure. Problem is, I’m in the Detroit Metro area so good luck prying the F150s out of people’s hands around here. Second off, with the plans fuck cars has there’d be areas where I’d have to park and walk to deliver stuff. I already have one outdoor mall I deliver to and it fucking blows having to park and walk all that way because 99% of the time I’m marked as late because it takes so long to deliver shit there. I’m not a slow walker either.

              So yes, less traffic would be nice. Will that ever happen in this particular city? Hell no.

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This seems very unhealthy. Maybe go take a stroll around the block?

    Edit: I’m referring to OP or whoever it was that made this image

  • CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I treat them like AntiWork, it’s fun to visit the zoo but living in one means dealing with a lot of random shit.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, who cares about the arrows. Sometimes I vote, sometimes I don’t. Sometimes my finger slips and I hit the wrong arrow anyway. I don’t bother to change it so I take my place as an arbiter of chaos.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can only imagine they meant 60% of the front view of the house. Otherwise that just seems insane.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But the problem is, words mean things. A lot of people unfortunately, put the wrong words down - and they think internally that it makes sense, but there is context missing in the words they put down. I’ve had entire conversations that went on for days, only for me to be 20 threads deep, and the person say “I mentioned that!!”, and I ask for them to show me where…only for them to realize they’ve been angry this whole time over something they assumed I was ignoring or misrepresenting. Turns out, they just simply internalized whatever it was, and didn’t write it.

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But I thought downvotes didn’t matter. 🤷

    I thought you guys said they’re both a necessary tool for community regulation and completely irrelevant to normal conversation on Lemmy.

    Yet here we are.

  • SwedishFool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuckcars is just a cult anyway, they go REEEE at any suggestion that cars are a necessity for many people, and that no busses nor bikes will ever compensate for it.

    • glassware@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weird how it’s literally impossible to ever live without something no one had 100 years ago

      • rexxit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you going to be first in line to give up your computer? Your phone? Antibiotics? Vaccines? Electricity?

        Innovation is real, even if you don’t personally like it. Motor vehicles are a legitimately good invention, arguably only becoming problematic due to increasing population and urbanization.

    • atticus88th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some of them are raging right now at the idea that not everyone who hates cars wants to live in an apartment.

      Its like liberals screaming when they findout you can be a liberal and a gun owner.

      Or conservatives when you express socialistic rights while also limiting government.

    • Disk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve followed the FuckCars community for a while (started on reddit). Being one of them car fuckers myself I would disagree. There certainly are people there whose thought process doesn’t go much further than car = bad, but boiling the whole community down to that does a disservice to their more important points. I think most people there aren’t so much advocating for less cars as much as they are advocating for policy and societal change toward a world where we aren’t so reliant on cars. Obviously for a massive chunk of the world population (especially in North America) cars are a necessity like you said, but do they need to be? Wouldn’t we all be better off if the world was less car dependent? We aren’t saying that there should be no more cars, just that we shouldn’t continue to design our cities in such a way that you need a car to live.

      If you are interested in more about where the fuckcars comunity is coming from I would recommend checking out the youtube channel Not Just Bikes. All of his videos are great but I think this one is a good intro to the channel. I also like this one because it outlines a lot of the specific “first step” type things that could be much better (most applicable to north america). Also, his Strong Towns Video Series is really good if you have the time.

      (here are a couple more because I can’t help myself: Why it sucks to grow up in car-centric cities, How American cities are ponzie schemes, and His video about Stroads)

    • LazyBane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a European, its funny watching these guys talk about “Europe” as this pure implementation of their motorphobic utopia.

      A lot of us still drive daily yanks!

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still. I live near Mannheim, out of the 8 people in my circle of close friends, 4 either outright do not own a car or share a car with their spouses, because their households can make do with one or less cars. They can absolutely make do with walking, bikes, tram, bus and train for everything in their daily lives. In many american cities of the same size, that would simply not be an option.

    • Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they live in the same reality I do, or maybe they’ve never seen Texas? Even if my local area was designed for foot traffic, the amount of space between literally everything here would make it impossible not to rely on a car.

      In DFW you can sum about any trip to somewhere you want to be to a 30 minute drive. Favorite restaurant that isn’t literally right next to you? 30 minutes or an hour without tolls. Work? That’s another 30 minutes. Wanna go to a store nicer than a Walmart? You guessed it. 30 minutes.

      Get home from work around 4:30? We’ll now you have a cool 5 hours of time until bed time. Subtract an hour of the gym, an hour of cooking and maybe you’ve got 3 hours of time to do anything else. Waiting for public transportation or wasting time walking would just cut down even more of the hours in your day. Maybe I want more out of life than sacrificing my time to public transportation and walking.

      • Disk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even if my local area was designed for foot traffic, the amount of space between literally everything here would make it impossible not to rely on a car.

        If your local area was designed for foot traffic, then things wouldn’t be so spread out. One of the many reasons this is so bad in america (and this is the case in DFW) are the awful parking minimum laws that have ruined so many cities. Since the 1950’s new business developments have been required to have a minimum amount of parking so that even at max capacity there would be enough spots. In a less car-centric city almost any place you would need to visit regularly -be it a grocery store, a department store, or whatever else- would certainly be within walking distance of (or a short public transit hop away from) your home and work. But the parking minimum laws spread everything so far apart that to walk or bike anywhere is unimaginable, and it also isn’t feasible to build up good public transit because you would need stops at every major street corner (rather than in a reasonable city where you would be taking transit hops between dense clusters of businesses and other destinations).

        In DFW you can sum about any trip to somewhere you want to be to a 30 minute drive. Favorite restaurant that isn’t literally right next to you? 30 minutes or an hour without tolls. Work? That’s another 30 minutes. Wanna go to a store nicer than a Walmart? You guessed it. 30 minutes. Get home from work around 4:30? We’ll now you have a cool 5 hours of time until bed time. Subtract an hour of the gym, an hour of cooking and maybe you’ve got 3 hours of time to do anything else. Waiting for public transportation or wasting time walking would just cut down even more of the hours in your day. Maybe I want more out of life than sacrificing my time to public transportation and walking.

        You said “I don’t think they live in the same reality I do,” but not only is this pretty much exactly the case in the city I live in, but I have given very similar rants when complaining about living in such a car dependent area. Honestly I was confused for a moment because you have some great points on why living in a city designed for cars sucks so much. The reason I consider myself a member of the fuckcars community isn’t that I think people should walk/bike more or that I don’t like cars. It’s that I want our city designs to change. Walking, biking, and even public transit simply doesn’t make sense in most North American cities but it doesn’t have to be that way. With policy change and redesign projects over time our cities could be so much better.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they add in the driveway the area would probably be about the same as the house.

    If we also add in the necessary roads and parking lots,it is pretty obvious that cars are creating a self-induced demand.

    We need to have cars because we need to drive around space for cars.