Elon Musk says he refused to give Kyiv access to his Starlink communications network over Crimea to avoid complicity in a “major act of war”.

Kyiv had sent an emergency request to activate Starlink to Sevastopol, home to a major Russian navy port, he said.

His comments came after a book alleged he had switched off Starlink to thwart a drone attack on Russian ships.

A senior Ukrainian official says this enabled Russian attacks and accused him of “committing evil”.

Russian naval vessels had since taken part in deadly attacks on civilians, he said.

“By not allowing Ukrainian drones to destroy part of the Russian military (!) fleet via Starlink interference, Elon Musk allowed this fleet to fire Kalibr missiles at Ukrainian cities,” he said.

“Why do some people so desperately want to defend war criminals and their desire to commit murder? And do they now realize that they are committing evil and encouraging evil?” he added.

The row follows the release of a biography of the billionaire by Walter Isaacson which alleges that Mr Musk switched off Ukraine’s access to Starlink because he feared that an ambush of Russia’s naval fleet in Crimea could provoke a nuclear response from the Kremlin.

Ukraine targeted Russian ships in Sevastopol with submarine drones carrying explosives but they lost connection to Starlink and “washed ashore harmlessly”, Mr Isaacson wrote.

Starlink terminals connect to SpaceX satellites in orbit and have been crucial for maintaining internet connectivity and communication in Ukraine as the conflict has disrupted the country infrastructure.

SpaceX, in which Mr Musk is the largest shareholder, began providing thousands of Starlink satellite dishes to Ukraine shortly after Russia launched its full-scale assault on its neighbour in February last year.

Responding to the book’s claim, Mr Musk said on X that SpaceX “did not deactivate anything” because it had not been activated in those regions in the first place.

“There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor,” he said.

“If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation.”

Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014, eight years before Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine

In the past, Mr Musk has said that while the system had “become the connectivity backbone of Ukraine all the way up to the front lines”, “we are not allowing Starlink to be used for long-range drone strikes”.

Mr Musk reiterated the point to Mr Isaacson, asking: “How am I in this war? Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

He also offered a personal opinion, calling for a truce and saying that Ukrainians and Russians were dying “to gain and lose small pieces of land” and this was not worth their lives.

He provoked anger last year when he proposed a plan to end the war which suggested the world formally recognise Crimea as part of Russia and asking residents of regions seized by Russia last year to vote on which country they wanted to be part of.

Russian chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov said that plan displayed “moral idiocy”

  • umbraroze@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Russian chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov said that plan displayed “moral idiocy”

    Musk: “Moral idiocy? Moral idiocy?! I’m not a moral idiot! I’m an immoral idiot! Besides, chess is a kid’s game! 1v1 me in Polytopia, bitch! Bet you can’t understand fog of war, noob!”
    Kasparov: “…very well. Please show me how these pieces move.”
    [15 minutes later later]
    Musk: “I can’t BELIEVE I fell for that.”

  • vandermouche@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just send Musk to the warfront, without any money or access to the ressources of his empire… As the normal persons that his action ruined the life. Maybe he will understand, even if he is an evil autistic oligarch.

    • nik0@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Unfortunately, not likely. Unless there are some apps that will be able to do that; we’re stuck with this.

      Sync actually has this

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Use Sync for Lemmy, keyword filter has been operational right from the beginning.

  • Endorkend@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the same bullshit take propagandists and Musk himself are spreading.

    Musk sabotaged an active military operation in an effort to save Russian assets and materials, by disabling access to Starlink in that area, to halt the operation. And then refused to undo what he did.

    All to protect Russian assets in an illegal undeclared war of annexation where Russia is the aggressor.

    Musks actions enabled the death of thousands of civilians in Ukraine and likely will cause far more through his actions which extend how long this illegal invasion will continue.

    Musk should be stripped of his US citizenship and booted right back to South Africa. America stands by Ukraine, South Africa tries to pretend they are neutral but the agreements they have with Russia and the opinions of rich fuck South Africans like Musk make it clear they stand with Russia.

    And anyone who keeps spreading these press releases with his propagandist take on the subject rather than saying how things actually happened, should be ashamed of themselves and monitored until all this is over.

  • MrSqueezles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Censorship is terrible. Except when I want to do it and pretend like I’m the best politician. Then it’s great.

  • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I say it’s ukraine’s fault to try and rely on a PRIVATE infrastructure for mission critical connectivity. That enabled Elon to in turn disconnect the service whenever he wanted. Maybe not rely on a private infrastructure where it’s owner has absolute control over the communication.

    • Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s their fault, but it is on them (and possibly all the supporters) this was allowed to happen.

      We can point fingers all we want, but the fact remains that Ukraine military relies on some private company ran by an ass, and now they suffer the consequence. This is also not even the first time this ass was giving them hard time.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Their existing infrastructure was destroyed by an invading nation. What do you expect them to do, put down fiber lines in the middle of a warzone?

  • Echo71Niner@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Right… Pretending it was not the U.S. gov. that pushed Elon to do this… A continuous conflict in Ukraine that bleeds Russia is the U.S. agenda.

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      You mean the same US government that was paying Musk specifically to maintain Starlink service in Ukraine? That one?

      Did you forget that the Pentagon was subsidizing Starlink? Or did you not know that before writing your very intellectual reply?

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do… do you know how much money the US has given to Ukraine for this effort? A continuous conflict is untenable. The U.S. gov would want the opposite of what you’re thinking

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Doubt it. The smart money says that he did it because he does a ton of business with the Chinese and is very nervous about being seen to actively take sides in a way that would cause them to see him as a potential security threat.

    • orangebussycat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Russia has anti satellite weapons. Why should he risk it for zero reward? At least the defense contractors are getting paid. Elon does it for free.

  • Bear@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why ISPs need to be neutral. Musk was never elected or appoints be a general. Otis not his place to decide what strikes happen or not. The blood of the people those ships have attacked are now on his hands.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      From my understanding, he didn’t pull the rug, instead he just never turned on satellites that he never said he would turn on

  • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are you all believing that UA military would depends that much on internet/Starlink, really? And it’s not like it is the only satellite network.

    Regarding OP, i don’t defend RU but I don’t support UA. None of my business if it was not my money which is flushed down in this proxy war and therefore, the money of my children!

  • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I find it difficult to hold Musk responsible for this. He’s a private citizen, not a nation. He doesn’t need to take part of a war, however just.

    Didn’t Pentagon take over these anyway since, or was this update related to something recent?

    edit Good points everywhere, I suck donkey dicks

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t. By all accounts, he personally made the call to interrupt Internet service in a way that directly impacted a military operation.

      If he had personally made the call from the start not to allow Starlink to be used for any military purposes, that would align with his claim to not want to take part in the war.