• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will admit there is something very pleasing about looking at a well trimmed yard. That said, the percent of the earth’s land surface covered by manicured lawns is tiny. The ag industry would love for you to believe your lawn is the problem. It isn’t. The problem is the monoculture farm land. Acres of fields with only one type of crop. And probably other things like pollution and such. But industries love to play the “you are the problem” card to divert from themsleves.

    • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but also: Every little bit of help, well… helps.

      Don’t let those industries playing the blame game discourage you from dedicating a part of your yard to a bunch of flowers, because then the problem would get ever so slightly worse.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but you could easily have a patch of lush green grass the size of this one in your lawn and also some nice flower beds, bushes, trees and whatever else. Most people want some of that, not just a plain garden with no features. The problem isn’t peoples’ yards, it’s pesticides.

    • HaiZhung@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the correct answer, this shit is „your carbon footprint“ all over again

      • IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Walk to work, ignore corporate consumption, and use only the highest quality refined petroleum products, and go easy on the avocados.”

  • sheppard@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The EU has uncultivated land subsidies. To avoid overproduction of food and overexploitation of the land, the EU pays farmers to keep their land uncultivated. Some countries, like mine, force farmers to uncultivate their land once every N years, and, of course, they get subsidies for this.

    In my region, farmers will plant flowers and let weed grow, since they’re not putting any pesticide. They let the flowers and weeds die and rot at the end of the season. This way, they dont have to put as much fertilizer the next year. I’ve always seen these uncultivated fields full of bees and other pollinators in summer.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That happens in the US too. It’s why there’s New York addresses that own huge “fields” of land that’s usually a wetland. The marginal land is protected and they get a corn subsidy from the government to not farm the land.

  • YⓄ乙 @aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reading all the comments and everyone is like not my yard , its full of flowers but for some reason I don’t see any bees or butterfly 🤷‍♂️

  • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find grass so useless. Every boomer parent I’ve known is just obsessed with it, too. They think that not having a green, green monoculture lawn means you’ve failed morally or something, and that it’s how they show the neighborhood how responsible they are. One GF’s dad came over to our random Winconsin lawn of grass and weeds and strawberries and was “I WOULD JUST PULL THIS ALL UP AND START OVER”. Uh… no?

    Then I had an across the street neighbor (guy with a bumper sticker “I’ve never seen a FLAG burned at a GUN SHOW”) who would mow his lawn every single day with a riding mower. You couldn’t even tell what part he had done yet. I went out of town for two weeks and he rode over and mowed my lawn. I left my backyard just go and it was awesome… after a few years, birds started nesting in the middle of the prairie, and I had flowers growing I’d never seen anywhere else.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      i never understood why american front yards dont have fences. just a barren wasteland of green from the curb to the front windows. fence your garden in!

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It seems like people used to suburbs see that as the pinnacle of life but of course that’s not true.

      In my experience rural areas get it because they are farmers and beekeepers with an understanding that working with nature is the way to go

    • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That guy was an asshole for doing that to you. I wonder if that might be considered trespassing. Dunno if you can have any civil remedy served to you, or if it’s even worth it, but still sucks.

    • mrchuckles@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      do you have kids? they love playing outside. barefoot. and a nice lawn is a paradise for bare feet. not to mention the actual process of mowing (electric mower) is very peaceful and good for my mental health. super therapeutic.

      • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but we also want those kids to have food when they grow up, don’t we?

          • Masimatutu@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or you can have a clover lawn, which is nice for insects as well as kids.

            Kids don’t dislike long, unkept grass either, as long as you keep the thistles out.

            • mrchuckles@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              seems pretty naive to think that it’s joe homeowner that’s the problem, and not insecticides and fertilizers from mega farm corporations like monsanto. let me know where to mail my apology letter lol

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      They all seem obsessed with plastic grass now which is even worse.

      My garden is mostly weeds. Haven’t cut it in 15 years. I pretend to be a trendsetting wild gardener, but really I’m just a lazy bastard.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How tall did the grass get? Did it pollinate, and if so, was it noticable for allergies? Were you still able to walk through it?

      I’m wondering what sort of plant you could let grow where you could still walk through easily. Maybe clover?

      • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Low height ground cover type plants grew naturally there. Clover, alfalfa, strawberries, unknown other plants, with an occasional thistle. Larger plants (whatever they were) would grow on the periphery. When he mowed my lawn it was maybe about a foot high.

        We were surrounded by acres of forest where plants grew wild, so if there was a problem with pollen, it wasn’t the .4 acres of my front lawn. Myt front lawn, I did mow occasionally. The back I let grow wild and yes, one could still walk through it.

        One of the lame things about lawn is that people don’t let them go to seed. If grass goes to seed, it not only regenerates itself, but also provides food for birds and squirrels. I was on an acre and a half across the street from this guy, and bounded by 30 feet of trees on ones side and 200 feet of forest on the other.

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t these allergies sometimes caused because you’re not exposed to the stuff? Like how it is for peanuts.

    • Rev. Layle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m 52 and hate mowing yards. Most other people my age are also obsessed with their lawns or simply “enjoy getting out and working on the yard”

      There few things worse than doing yard work. I think dying is one of them, maybe.

      Anyways, yeah we have a yard. We try to keep various bushes and wildflowers as we can. We go as log as possible in early spring to not mow and get all the clover and stuff to bring the bees and like insects over.

      As for mowing, I pay someone 50 dollars every 2 weeks to keep it not looking like crap.

      My father-in-law, who lives with us, used to do most of the gardening and lawn stuff. He is too old now to do any of it. He’s always trying to get the rest of the people in the house to do stuff in the yard. I keep telling him "you know you are the only one who really gives a shit on how ‘nice’ the yard looks. My only goal is to keep the city and neighbors off our back, that’s it.’

      EDIT: Also neighbors seem intent on having a single uniform grass breed and obsessed with having no weeds. Nah, I have all the grasses and weeds. I have a neighbor down the street who is always just HAND PULLING weeds out of her lawn. Like hours and hours of it. I mean… wat

      • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems to be something that retired people love, to keep them active and give them something to do (a sense of purpose besides grandchildren?). I don’t mind yardwork myself, but I don’t feel like it’s virtuous or something. I also understand that a chemical-sodden monoculture isn’t really the best for humans and wildlife.

        My mother used to try to get us… oh, she still does… to come “PULL WEEDS”. As kids it made sense, like okay, she wants us to get away from the video games and be outside and do whatever she’s saying, but at this point…

    • doctordevice@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you sue? I’d have been livid enough to try to sue. IANAL, but at a minimum I would hope that would be trespassing.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean that’s probally overkill, that person was either OCD or was thinking he was doing them a favor. That sounds like a great way to have a pissed off neighbor and a potentially hostile neighborhood

        • doctordevice@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d feel a little different (still pissed) if it was a next door neighbor who extended their mow. But to cross the street and change someone’s property without permission is already hostile to me.

      • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I doubt that I could have demonstrated real harm, or even proved that he did it. I got back into town a week later and my brother, who had been watching the house, said “huh, the guy across the street mowed the front yard”.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        By the letter of the law it probably is, but if they hadn’t expressly been told not to it won’t go anywhere.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some places have bylaws on maximum lawn height and you can actually be fined for letting it go. That’s how insane people are about lawns.

        • someguy3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought it was virtually all places. I’m surprised the other guy could even let the lawn go native.

        • doctordevice@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not everywhere is in an HOA. And many people allow native vegetation on purpose to give local wildlife something to eat (see OP).

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get it as a dog owner with only a courtyard. But he goes on long hikes in the bush and big walks a few times a week. It’d be nice to give the little fella a patch to hang on while I’m at work. And I mean a patch—I hate mowing and any yard work motivation in me is for citrus, chilli, and grapes.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is the risk of tick transmission of Lyme disease in tall grass. I suppose you can pretreat to prevent contraction, but mowing grass means you don’t have those threats/hazards to worry about.

          I still hate lawns and wish more would be native, but I wonder if there’s a way to grow a native lawn such that you invite the good wildlife and keep out the bad. Would need a biologist to chime in

      • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My yard was very low with ground cover. I actually did mow the front, I just didn’t care if it was grass or a bunch of random other plants. I had a dog when my gf lived with me, but at this point, didn’t. There were so many rabbits and deer I actually just grew my vegetable garden on the front porch in containers.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went out of town for two weeks and he rode over and mowed my lawn.

      This happened to me too. grillman are so violently obsessed with inch-high fuzzy green rectangles of obedience that they’ll sometimes invade your property to make more of them, overriding any of their own pretenses about the sanctity of private property in the process.

      • sanguine_artichoke@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think he thought he was doing me a favor, but really was just jerking off his lawn obsession. Same guy told me one time “HEY i saw a bear in your driveway and I was gonna come run it off so it didn’t mess with your garbage but it left!” I was uh, okay… no, please don’t come confront a bear in my driveway. Dude drank light beer all day.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my case, it was deliberate aggression because I had told him, in person and to his face, that those were protected native plants and I had a legal right to have them on my property.

          But grillman “did me a favor” with a disgusting little smirk when I confronted him about it later. He even implied that I got nothing to prove what he did because I don’t have the surveillance state shit that he has on his side of the fence.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember it’s not just about saving honey bees! Honey bees are domesticated, which means that humans will make sure that they have food and shelter and appropriate medicine and care throughout the year to ensure they make honey.

    Saving “the bees” moreso means saving wild, native, often times solitary bees like bumblebees or carpenter bees that don’t produce honey but that also aren’t domesticated - they have no safety net that humans give them.

    Those bees along with all other pollinators like bats, birds, and other insects are the ones at risk!

    Still, we should all consider growing native yards to return habitat back to these dying species!

  • Jubei Kibagami@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    In those moments I’m as high as fuck and imagine I could own a home, I’d just desert-ify the yard. It’s going that way anyway, let’s beat the rush. Just sand and rocks and some desert plants. Like us, most yards will die in the water wars.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    ……Because of insecticides from agriculture.

    It has literally nothing to do with people mowing their lawns.

    If you got rid of all of the lawns you’d still see mass extinction of honey bees.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No.

      Honey bees are dying because of parasites and pests, pathogens, poor nutrition, and sublethal exposure to pesticides.

      It’s not just one thing. Most of those things on their own won’t even kill them. For example, Varroa mites will kill an already weakened hive, but not a healthy one.

      Lawns absolutely contribute to poor nutrition, due to habitat loss. Same with all the mowed grass we have everywhere in suburbia. Monocropped agriculture does as well, because bees do best with a variety of flowers.

      I’ve let the back part of my property grow wild the past couple years, and it’s currently filled with a ton of goldenrod, chicory, and a bunch of other random flowers. You would not beleive the number of honeybees I’ve seen back there at once, or how loud the buzz was.

      Similarly, there’s a reason I see a ton of fireflys in my yard, but I see almost none in my neighbors yards. It’s because they’re well- manicured green wastelands

    • MayvisDelacour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure but why add to the problem? Why not carve out your own little slice and help the situation? Probably not going to hurt anything if you stop using pesticides and feed the bees where you can.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not adding to the problem. As long as farmers are using fuck tons of pesticides and insecticides every day it doesn’t matter what you do to your lawn.

        Either way insects are going to die.

        You guys love slinging shit but you have no clue where to sling it.

  • Titan@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Individual yards are such a wasteful and environmentally destructive concept

  • S_204@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just isn’t accurate. Your lawn isn’t responsible for the death of bees. You also don’t need pesticides for a healthy nice looking lawn.

  • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just the bees, all bugs in North America have seen a 75% die off in the last 20 years.

    Big shocker that songbirds, which eat those bugs, have also seen a massive die off.

    Despite those deniers that still blame housecats, the true culprit is almost certainly pollution and pesticides.

      • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Housecats were actually keeping the bird population healthy for decades by eliminating the weak. Of course now that habitat destruction and toxins made entire populations weak it is a problem.

        But removing housecats to solve it is akin to drinking out of paper straws to solve plastic pollution. It helps, but it doesn’t do anything substantial.

        • kbotc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would you say that? Hawks and owls were the “natural” predator of North American song birds and I’ve seen plenty of raptors in my large US city. Not like bobcats are suffering population-wise in urban areas.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Outside cat / feral cats have had massive negative impacts on bird and small mammal populations. Particularly in areas where they fill an ecological niche that the wildlife hasn’t adapted to due to none of the local fauna being in that niche. Hawaii and Australia in particular have this problem.

          • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those are indeed special situations where cats are basically an invasive species.

            Here in Europe the correlation between cats and bird population is not so strong. While destruction of habitat and the crash in insect numbers are the big culprits.

    • cobra89@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Despite those deniers that still blame housecats

      Both things can be true. They aren’t mutually exclusive.

      Also we have less pollution and pesticide use than we did in the 60s and 70s. Why is it just becoming a problem now?

      • Turun@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I bet that while we have less general pollution and less dumping trash in the environment kinda things, we have developed much more potent insecticides. And if those insecticides do not degrade within a few weeks they will accumulate in the earth and the water.

        Edit: Wikipedia about one type of modern pesticides: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neonicotinoid

        • bentropy@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, pretty sure your lawn has almost nothing to do with insects vanishing. It’s much more likely the insane amounts of highly potent pesticides we put directly into our food chain. Those pesticides obviously aren’t classified as pollution so we aren’t polluting, we’re killing the environment on purpose.

          Btw. The development and use of neonicotines corelate quiet nicely with the drop in the insects population.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To put that in perspective, let’s say I drink water contaminated with chemicals for decades. Then, “suddenly”, me and half the people i know are sick with cancer and various side effects decades later…

        That’s how environmental toxins work. They accumulate throughout the water cycle and through the food web, and if its less than acute (short term) in effect it statistically hurts a population, such as lowering reproduction or creating birth defects that lower the fitness. Then, once concentrations pass LD thresholds (lethal dose, meaning LD50 will kill half of the individuals of a species on average, LD10 would kill 1 in 10) you start getting mass die offs

        Every water table, all of the soil, every living being is riddled with non-naturally occurring substances. Even though we released more damaging toxins in the 80s, the rate of pollution doesn’t matter - the concentration in various parts of the ecosystem is what matters, and that’s a slow process

      • DrCatface@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        less pollution? that cannot possibly be true. according to dr google 1970s world population was 3.7b, now we’re more than double that

        • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m the US, the EPA was created in the 1970’s. We definitely have less pollution (of certain types) today than we did in the past. Some notable examples of how disgustingly polluted American skies and waterways were in the past:

          The skies of Pittsburgh, PA

          the Cuyahoga River fire

          Coal Production has also been declining

          And then of course less visible examples like the Montreal Protocol stopping corporations from depleting the ozone layer.

          My point is in terms of greenhouse gas production we are much higher than in the 60’s and 70’s, but we have massively improved in a lot of areas. Of course there is still room to improve.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Im gonna dig a pit in my backyard and make a pond. Its gonna be a lot of work but it will all be worth it when i sit out on my patio in the morning sipping coffee to the sound croaking frogs, buzzing bugs, and chirping birds.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You will want to be careful doing that. It needs to be big enough to have differential temperature so the water moves, therefore aerating it. Without air in the water nothing but mosquitos can live or breed in it. Also, depending on the soil and whether you are above the water line, you may not be able to keep enough water in it between rainfalls.

        I’m sure you can look up how to do one properly, I just want to to be aware it’s not as simple as dig a hole and fill it with water, because that will do more damage than good.

        • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course I’ve been doing a lot of research dont worry. And also I’ll be using a pond liner

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I want to make a short film / animation where aliens are approaching earth, the only thing we know about the aliens is that they plan to destroy all life and replace it with their own twisted creation. A few minutes of typical story follows, heroes assemble, go to fight, etc. The heroes lose and the ending scene shows that the aliens have succeeded and replaced all the diverse life on Earth with a perfectly manicured lawn that covers the entire planet. A biological wasteland.