• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The experimental feature was initially spotted by MSPowerUser, and Firefox’s senior director of product management Byron Jourdan confirmed that the company is testing the functionality “with a limited audience in the United States,” in a statement given to The Verge.

    Fake reviews are a big problem for online retailers, which have had to take increasingly aggressive measures to stop malicious actors from using them to boost the ratings of their products.

    Screenshots posted by MSPowerUser show how the tool is accessible via a price tag icon in the browser’s URL bar, which brings up a sidebar with details on the current open product page.

    The Review Checker feature is powered by technology from Fakespot, a company Mozilla acquired earlier this year.

    The company “uses a sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) system to detect patterns and similarities between reviews in order to flag those that are most likely to be deceptive,” Mozilla said when it announced the acquisition, noting that it planned to integrate the technology into its browser to “make Firefox customers the best equipped to cut through deceptive reviews.”

    Fakespot already offers its review checking services via its website, extensions for browsers like Chrome and Safari, and iOS and Android apps.


    Saved 51% of original text.

  • Mixel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems Interesting. I hope this will also be a local feature and not dependent on a cloud service but since the Company behind this is using some AI and ML I doubt that it will run on the computer especially since firefox is known to run on basically anything

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      With Firefox’ recent addition of “offline” translations I wouldn’t rule out that they’ll run this locally as well.

      Not sure whether that’s a more complex model though.

      • Mixel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know about that, and I love that it runs locally. I just hope that they will keep this mindset, I would love to have such tool available at all times Edit: Personally I also agree its a bit weird that it will be a native feature, maybe an official extension would be more adequate

    • twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried Opera on a few of my devices lately and frankly I’m impressed by the responsiveness. I still can’t get rid of Firefox but I find myself moving over to Opera more and morem

      • zhunk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Out of curiosity, why are you trying to get rid of Firefox?

        I dumped Chrome to switch to Firefox a few months ago and haven’t really had any problems with it. I miss tab groups on mobile, but that’s about it.

        • twistedtxb@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Firefox doesn’t have native HEVC support. So I switched to Opera because no other browser except for Safari has that feature.

          Supposedly Edge has it, but couldn’t get it to work on my media server app.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Best browser, even though that goes without saying when the competitor is Chrome.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Omg just be a browser please. Desktop PWAs are still not a feature in Firefox. Search input elements still don’t have a native “clear” button. Hardware acceleration on Linux is only like a year old feature. Etc.

    I love you Firefox, but you’re losing focus. If I wanted built-in gimmicks I’d use Edge (okay probably not but you get the idea)

    • java@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d argue that fact checking can be more important today than anything that you’ve mentioned. Modern problems require modern solutions and it’s natural that browsers extend their feature sets. I’d agree with you had they announced that they were planning to merge Firefox and Thunderbird.

      • Rekliner@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        PWAs are great. Half the apps in app stores are just packaged browsers, we should take away the need for that bloat…using the engine of your choice would be a bonus. Plus they create the option of skipping app stores entirely, which is another step away from the Google/Apple oligopoly.

      • neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather use a PWA that uses my firefox install than use an electron app which bundles chromium. And PWAs are standard, and can work on mobile too…

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When the options are “install” as a PWA or download a bloated Electron app, I’m going with the PWA. Every time. :shrug: It would just be nice to be able to do that in FF without any kind of 3rd party helpers.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, no one’s yet succeeded in making a workable checker (AI-written text and the writing of English-as-foreign-language speakers are awkwardly similar along many axes, apparently, so existing checkers have a lot of false positives).

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is already done, as a way to improve AI, in a technique called Generative Adversarial Neural Networks (GANN).

      One network’s task is to produce fake content. The other network’s task is to detect it. These networks then evolve together, each getting better and better.

      What that means is that if we develop a means to detect AI-generated content, then that mechanism becomes the stepping stone to better AI.

  • Samuel Proulx@rblind.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So who are they sending our product browsing data to in order to provide this service? At least I know what Microsoft and Google are doing with my data (nothing good). But Pocket and cloudflare and there VPN provider and whatever other random companies Firefox partners with? Who knows! How do I opt out? Who knows! How secure are these companies? Who knows! At least using Edge or Chrome I only have to hand over my data to one evil corporation, instead of several. Plus I actually get things I want in return (for me: automatic image descriptions, reader mode, read aloud, and AI based page summaries). Nothing I get from the companies Firefox works with are things I even want.

  • NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I installed the Fakespot extension and then went looking through my past purchases. It seemed to work really well and called out things as shady for products that I can say, first hand, were actually kind of sketchy.