Hi, I’m new with self-hosting but managed to set up my own Lemmy and Mastodon instances on a VPS recently. However, I ran into an issue with disk space quite rapidly (which I had way too few, because I started with the cheapest, smallest package for my VPS).

Now I prepare a new setup, where I’ll be able to dynamically scale disk space as needed, but this can get expensive quickly. Therefor my question: How much disk space do I typically need for private (1-3 user) instances of Lemmy and Mastodon? Are there settings, where I can limit the disk space utilization (at the cost of older stored content being overwritten)?

I would be fine with needing up to like 30-40 GB, but any more than that would be getting kinda expensive …

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That will depend on usage. If you subscribe to a lot of communities that are very active the database will grow fairly fast. If your users post a ton of large files then that will grow much much faster than the database. Your instance also caches image thumbnails so that can grow somewhat fast too.

    Currently sitting at 750 MB for pictrs and 500MB for postgres after a week, so you may want to plan a decent size but 30-40GB should be fine for a while to get started. Add some monitoring for when it reaches 10, 20 and 30GB and keep an eye on it.

    • Baku@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Heya, sorry for the necropost, but would you mind sharing how you’re doing on storage these days? I’m looking at spinning up a Lemmy instance of my own and I’m curious about the storage aspect on small instances

  • GreenDot 💚@le.fduck.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I have my lemmy instance currently using about 2 GB space, I’m going to set up Mastadon this weekend I hope. There are cheap smaller dedicated servers from kimsufi for like $10 with 1/2 TB HDD.

    Also Hetzner cloud has compute and disk separated, so you can scale one or the other.

    I’ve got a 500GBSSD box from Hetzner, but I’m also hosting other things there and dropped VMs from Linode I had previously and consolidated there.

    You could use object storage, like s3 or wasabi, for lemmy picture/media storage, if that’s eating up most space. “cloud” providers are bit bananas when you need more disk, at one point its cheaper to go down a dedicated route. Depends on your budget…

    Edit: Others might chime in with a better answer, at the moment bot sure what your budget is, so its bit of assumptions from my side.

  • aU5ern4me@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No expert here but usualy you use an external object storage (should be configurable in lemmy via pict-rs) which should be cheaper then VPS storage ^^

    Maybe have a look into it.

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    With Lemmy, it will depend more on the amount of media that your users upload than anything. With Mastodon, you also will have to consider the amount of data in the cache.

    With Mastodon, I have (small) instances running for about an year or so which are using less than 100GB, and I have instances from power users that went on to take ~250GB in less than a month.

    You can set up Mastodon to delete posts after a certain age and to clear the remote cache periodically. This would help mitigate both things.

  • Ruud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you need Mastodon, or can it be something similar? Mastodon does a lot of caching. For my single-user instance I run Akkoma, which is very leight-weight and has all (even more) features Mastodon has.

    • Ruud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      By the way this is Media disk usage for my Mastodon instance, but it’s not really small ;-)

  • TX@nadajnik.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Solvena my kbin instance is using 37 GB right now, and it is one of the oldest instances. I don’t have many user thou.

  • losttourist@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can’t help with Lemmy, but I’ve been running a single-user Mastodon instance for almost a year now.

    Like you, I found that the media very quickly used up much more disk space than I anticipated. There are a few things you can do.

    You can tune how long media is stored for: some of this is done in the admin interface, but really you need to set up cron jobs to regularly run various tootctl commands. This is the crontab I use:

    SHELL=/bin/bash
    PATH=/home/mastodon/.rbenv/shims:/home/mastodon/.rbenv/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
    
    RAILS_ENV=production
    # Remove media attachments older than 8 days
    11  19  *   *   *     cd /home/mastodon/live && time bin/tootctl media remove --days 8
    # Remove link previews older than 28 days
    22  5   *   *   *     cd /home/mastodon/live && time bin/tootctl preview_cards remove --days 28
    # Remove files not linked to any post
     3  23  *   *   0     cd /home/mastodon/live && time bin/tootctl media remove-orphans
    # Prune remote accounts that never interacted with a local user
    44  1   *   *   *     cd /home/mastodon/live && time bin/tootctl accounts prune
    
    

    You can of course choose even stricter settings but I found that no matter what I did, given that I am following approx 1,000 other Fediverse accounts it still used up more disk space than I was comfortable with.

    So I offloaded most of the media storage onto an S3-compatible service. It’s breaking the self-hosting ethos somewhat, but with Backblaze B2 I can happily store and serve several hundred GB of media files for just a couple of dollars a month. To me, that was a no-brainer.