• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    its funny watching google do the very thing they used to make fun of microsoft for doing…

    that is the big EEE… Embrace, Extend and Extinguish.

    • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Of Google Chrome? No

      Of Chromium? Yes, but if you’re the kind of person who prefers open source, you’d probably prefer Firefox anyway

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m a hardcore ff user. I’m mocking the people in every thread like this who pretend chrome is actually better in some way

          • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I just want to be able to drag a tab straight into a snap zone with Firefox (like can be done w chromium browsers). Instead I have to drag the tab out, then click the new window and drag that where I want. And with the frequency of tab shuffling I do, even this minor inconvenience is pretty annoying. Oh, and it’s been in the bug tracker/feature request for 15 years.

            I’m taking a shot at fixing it myself but this is not my forte.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I can understand wanting that feature but I also get deprioritizing it. I feel like I shuffle tabs and windows quite a bit as I have multiple monitors, and even I have rarely even thought about that as a lacking feature (I have indeed noticed it). It’s just one extra drag, takes half a second.

  • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    And like that, they just ensured that I’d sooner use Edge than go back to anything with the faintest whiff of Chrome in it

      • Amerikan Pharaoh@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Please tell me you’re fucking about

        Granted I don’t think anything will happen to Firefox for a while; but please tell me you’re fucking about

        • Merlin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Pretty much every single browser today with the exception of Safari and Firefox are built on top of chromium. Google owns it and will direct it whatever way it wants.

          If Firefox market share continues the small amount it is, there’s a good chance that websites will just block anything not running on chromium after v3 goes out. As it’ll be a decent price to pay to lose 4% of your users but force the other 96% to watch ads that they can’t block anymore.

          That’s why I tell everyone please use Firefox.

      • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        No, it’s a fork of Chromium. Google says they’re blocking uBlock Origin in Chrome, not Chromium

  • Gabu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    10 months ago

    Got to thank Google, they’ve reallybeen helping Firefox gain market share

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    People forget that the next step of Google will be the inconvenience. Meaning they’ll make Firefox work badly on YouTube and other google websites. Have a video not play here, bad css layout there. Subtle stuff that will make people hate to use Firefox and because Google is dictating the Web standards, they will do so, in fact they actually already do. I’ve already had a few websites using some kind of PWA framework, that was horribly slow on Firefox compared to Chromium based browser.

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No. Net neutrality is about ISPs, not about applications. It might violate anti-trust, but the military is a major counterweight to any attempts at disrupting Google (among others)

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      FreeTube and other front-end replacements exist. Could they turn them off? Sure, with a bit of work.

      Though so long as it is a public service (responds to the public) that does not require an account to watch videos … they will only ever be able to annoy people. It’s the same problem as piracy. It’s a question of convenience, and if they make the main road a less good experience than the stripped down one… They’re only hurting themselves.

      If Google had half a brain, they would’ve embedded the ads in the video streams years ago. Instead, they “innovate” by making the entire internet worse.

      (yes I know ublock blocks A LOT more than YouTube ads, and Google’s revenue is all their ads, but YouTube is a perfect microcosm of why Google is the wrong company to solve this problem)

    • avater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah I don’t give a flying fuck how much inconveniences they create, I rather would push a hoop with a stick and never use YouTube or the Internet again then using chrome.

      I’ve been using Firefox since its debut and I never had any issues, slowdowns or problems with it, same with DuckDuckGo so Google can stick it somewhere where the light doesn’t shine.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Like that time they disabled those reddit plugins that were used to fight trolls/nazis on the site, a change which unsurprisingly caused a huge surge of far right trolling on the platform until people found out how to get around it. Evil company.

  • tiita@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m on Firefox already. Using Chrome just for work.

    I wonder if edge will also be affected being on chromium

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I hope it doesn’t apply to all Chromium browsers cause RTX Super Resolution Video is a godsend for low quality YouTube videos and Firefox doesn’t support it.

  • red@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why the HN post is a link to Reddit? Why people still use Reddit? I downvoted this and the HN post

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    NOT ENTIRELY TRUE. 🤦

    Google confirms they will disable MV2 extensions including uBlock Origin in mid 2024

    MV2 extensions.

    Ublock Origin Lite is MV3 based: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh

    Yes, it’s not exactly the same, in how filters are embedded instead of updated separately.

    In any case, this is part of Google’s long (long, since 2018 or earlier?) transition to MV3.

    So let’s put down the pitchforks and Monster energy drinks for the moment. This isn’t the attack on adblockers you think it is.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      So it’s ok because they will still allow a shittier version of ubo? … No.

    • CharAhNalaar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Google chose to make MV3 neutered in comparison to MV2. They could’ve found a way to allow the capabilities required for runtime adblocking. They chose not to.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 months ago

    Live free or die.

    Ever since the early days of Google excitement (early naughties), everyone missed the point. You don’t need a big corporation with good intentions to save you. They’ll sooner round on you when it suits them simply because they can.

    Everyone excitedly using and in turn relying on Gmail and Google maps like they were healing the tech world simply let the vampire into their home. We need sustainable systems and cultures with values and no “too big to fail” monopolistic companies dictating the landscape.