I tried to correct someone’s grammar and someone else wrote a multi-paragraph response on why “should of” is an acceptable alternative to “should have”.
Best interaction of my life, unironically
Kind of like the more proper “hell of” instead of “hella.”
There’s no reason a civil discussion can’t be had, even when the other person insists on being confidently incorrect.
But it’s really funny to watch, especially if both of them are wrong and won’t back down
Just curious, what was the main gist of their argument?
The best part is their autocorrect changed it to “should have”, so they said something like “should have is just as correct as should have”
Damn, I remember that discussion.
Having chat gpt write it for you?
Taps head head meme
I love using ChatGPT write me fan fiction about sensually nibbling the dingleberries off Aki Rosenthal‘s asshole.
When you have your English paper peer reviewed and nobody says anything bad about it to fix.
When you write a generally accepted opinion online and have to defend your position like it’s a master’s thesis.
time to swipe Random words on my keyboard: go do an RN FB do is of of of of on to do the hmm is is us egg the to the the TV is oh of of of us do the to the FB group if it’s on if stuff GB the sizzing do do do do to us ha so HC go juurde hi Judy i do so so retain dish for go do an RN reg suck do do to do do do do do do do cost do drop to to unit 46
people who gravitate toward this written conversation-based social media with strangers we never want to meet, we just love to write, mmmkay?
Makes me wonder. Has there ever been a Lemmy meetup?
That always goes well, I’ll make the Kickstarter!
