• I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    seal.cafe, cawfee.club and sleepy.cafe sure got welcoming names. Given the number of defederations, I doubt the contents are anything like the names.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Most of them were automatically defederated for not having adequate protection against bot signups, that got nothing to do with sketchy content.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        If the bots are welcomed and they don’t have good enough moderation, this is just sketchy content with extra steps.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        As someone interested in both sides of security game theory, what exactly helps stop bots? I grew up playing RuneScape and hating bots before making r/Artisanvideos and hating them even more. I’ve always wondered if it’s a matter of automatically detecting precise repetitive patterns or just specific giveaway signs.

    • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Federated means that any instance that is federated with them receives their content and can bee seen on that instance.

      Defederated means they are not federated anymore, thus blocking both users and content.

      It’s usually done to combat content you don’t want on your instance

      • bouldering_barista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok ok… So me using Lemmy.world is a specific instance of Lemmy, so it’s almost like its own server? And other instances (maybe lemmy.unitiedstates?) is its own federated instance likely related to just U.S. posts and it can communicate with other instances? Do de-federated instances have no other communication with instances?

        Apologies if these are silly, I feel like a dum dum because everyone else seems to grasp this except me.

    • WhatThaFudge@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So you need to look at the number of de federations. That is basically how many other instances have blocked them and do not receive content from them to their feed. You can still go to all these instances using their respective urls and see what they are like. The reasons for blocking them vary depending on the instance. Edit: They can still be federated with other instances that don’t block them creating their own little fediverse bubbles.

    • Gianmarco Gargiulo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Defederated means that the server has been forbidden from connecting and communicating with specific other servers that have decided to defederate with it, so users from the server can’t see or interact with users and posts on the server that defederated it and vice versa. Hopefully I was clear and coincise.

  • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Those all look horrifying, and I am curious to see if they are what they seem to be but also not

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Surprised Gab isn’t the record holder, it was the big deal example the fediverse advocates held up as how awesome the fediverse is at moderating itself, especially the “defed if federated with” rule instances started using to actually quarantine the users from Gab

  • key@lemmy.keychat.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Makes me kinda wish that when defederating you could select a one word label for why. Like a fixed list with several options like pedo, spam, harassment, abandoned, etc and a default of other. Make it a bit easier with a big list like this to say, oh 1000 of these 1400 all selected “racism” when defederating so it’s probably very racist and I should also defederate. But if it’s a lot of “other” or inconsistent reasons maybe I should spend a bit of time digging.

        • zed@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe nazi bullshit? Alt as in alt-right and nazi bullshit being illegal in Germany 🤷‍♂️

        • ijeff@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Agreed! I’m really appreciative of folks putting this kind of work into Lemmy.

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sooooo much CSAM and lolicon on there. Disgusting. One question tho, what does “map” mean in this context?

        • magnetosphere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Here’s the beginning of the Wikipedia article:

          Kiwi Farms, formerly known as CWCki Forums, is a web forum that facilitates the discussion and harassment of online figures and communities. Their targets are often subject to organized group trolling and stalking, as well as doxxing and real-life harassment.

          So, it’s an assholefarm.

          Although the name originated with one particular site, it looks like the name now applies to any site that serves a similar purpose. Bleah.

          • Comrade Spood@lemmyunchained.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            A small instance where members vote on decisions regarding the instance. Haven’t really had to vote on anything though cause it’s so small and not a lot to vote on. But it’s nice it’s there for if we do need it.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        What’s up with all the pedo instances? Why are they creating instances in an open web? Are they dumb or something? It sounds to me that just registering the domain names of some of those could be considered a crime, nevermind openly inviting and hosting CSAM.

        • that guy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Honeypots and also to discourage people from engaging to corral people into big tech where surveillance is #1

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I am not a lawyer, but I imagine there’s no way I could register, or get away with if I do register something like “molester daycare” or “pedo toothbrush for kids”… Oh wait, apparently the last one is actually a thing. Well then I guess it’s not, but man that’s an unfortunate brand name

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well, a few people have already pointed out the nastiest sounding one, so I’ll go with wolfgirl.bar

    Pretty sure I’d want eye bleach after that.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Or of curiosity, what’s bad about that one? I’m a person who likes animal peepz, but if they’ve been defederated there’s gotta be more to it that “wolf girls the server”

      Quick edit: I went there and I need an account to see stuff, which id rather not do if this server has issues.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a real rogues gallery of internet. And… a soccer team from Detroit. What the fuck did those guys do?

      • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Best sport in the world. Football is more than just FIFA etc, you know? Getting children to play and have fun is good. Me and my friends playing football is also good. But yeah, just boil everything down to how corps fuck things up.

        Lol why the f do I get downvoted for this.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The internet. It’s a fucked up place. Nothing like what the big players on the internet would have you believe.

      So long as there exists a way for people to not get prosecuted, these things will exist.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Realistically, the more accessible the internet becomes the more it reflects the behavior of humanity at large.

        These things exist because they’re part of us. The internet probably makes them more visible, but I doubt it makes them more extant.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Some of these im… Curious about. Presumably the names are dog whistles (when they’re not just openly stating their purpose)… But IDK the whistle so I’m curious af.

    Not curious enough to get put on some list by actually checking them out though lol

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh those hate sites are very closely moderated. They know exactly what kind of content they want on there and anything else gets the boot.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        But like…

        Free cum extremist?!? Porn and radical political views in the same place? I’m intrigued!

        I’m honestly most curious about wolfgirl because that just sounds like furry shit, but nobody hates furries that much, so what dog whistle am I missing???

        • Wolfgirl: feed is broken, or possibly just denied until you login. Don’t care enough to make an account. About page:

          It’s not a war crime if you had fun doing it.
          I reserve the right to bully you in any way my administration powers allow, or just normally.

          Eh.

          FCE: broken, 50/50 chance of malware, meh.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      try ’em out with Tor – get onto a federal list and an NSA list at the same time …

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      “cum.salon” sounds thrilling. I both want it to be exactly what it says it is, but also, something completely different.

  • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Where/how is this obtained?

    I’m curious about seeing an entire list of defederated instances.

    • Dramatic Shitposter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Where/how is this obtained?

      I’m curious about seeing an entire list of defederated instances.

      fba.ryona.agency

      Be aware that it doesn’t track when lemmy instances defederate from other fediverse instances correctly and hasn’t for months, and that it’s run someone from one of those 50 defederated instances.

  • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s funny/sad the stark contrast between the ones where you can’t really tell why they’re federated from just the name vs the ones where it’s extremely obvious (and how little in-between there is)

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Places like Lemmygrad and Hexbear are actually pretty benign. They’re just on the verge of being acceptable to people so they make a lot of noise and cause a lot of drama but in terms of the actual bad actors… well, as you can see, they don’t even rate.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Meh, I don’t really find the open mass murder fetish benign at all. I don’t care what color your fash is, it’s still abhorrent.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I guess it’s slightly better that they’re mostly honest deniers instead of “they had it coming” types.

          I think. I personally find it refreshing in small doses to deal with people that actually know what the fuck they’re talking about in terms of political theory, some of the shit .world users will say is…

          Upsetting, intellectually.

          Of course, so is talking to a genuine Stalinist.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            My experience with hexbear has been pretty fucking far from them knowing political theory, outside of one very specific niche they can kind of articulate as long as you don’t ask them to reduce any of it to fundamentals or first principles.

            As far as I can tell, their one trick is quoting books they haven’t actually read, assuming nobody else has read them either. I’ve literally had this same interaction three or four times at this point, over books which don’t say the things they think they say. Like multiple people arguing that some Chomsky work supports their orthodox ML theory.

            You can literally get them to argue against the works they are trying cite by quoting them. It’s amusing for a bit, but then it’s just sad.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Hexbear and Lemmygrad are different instances, but tbh at this point I’m just happy with people that can at least vaguely define liberalism and socialism, and I don’t have to see the great minds upvote “communism is right wing, AKSHUALLY, because right wing means authoritarian.”

              Edit: ah wait, your comment was under one about both, I conflated it with the other chain about Lemmygrad specifically.

      • neidu@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Agreed. While I tend to disagree with most of the viewpoints coming from lemmygrad, at least the content is posted with benign intent. The room might stink, but nobody intentionally shat on the floor.

    • Kierunkowy74@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nobody on a Lemmy instance is able to follow accounts (like on Mastodon or /kbin). Thus, Lemmy will not fetch anything from Mastodon unless written specifically to a threadiverse community (and the community being CCed). Because of this, Lemmy instance are less harmful, than (potentially) any microblogging server (be it Mastodon, Pleroma, Soapbox, *key, etc.)

    • Arelin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I bet a large part of the Fediverse are Communist/Socialist too, or have similar ideas. Lemmy’s devs are, after all.

      I mean, the whole thing is based on the idea of being free to use for everyone.

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I see your Point. I see myself also as rather left. But the People over at Lemmygrad are not really left imo. They are authoritarian, for sure. But left? I don’t know. I don’t want to claim to be the sole “Incarnation of leftism” it’s just that many of my views and beliefs are the opposite of theirs.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          The spectrum is more than left and right, I know political compass memes on Reddit got taken over by nazis but there is legitimately a whole compass. Stalin is somewhat center left, nudist hippie communes are lower left corner

        • Arelin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Being vehemently against racism and fascism is left. It’s the logical extreme opposite of “a certain group of people are superior to everyone else”: “everyone is equal and their basic necessities should be provided for free”

          You just seem to disagree with the folks over on grad and Lemmy devs on how that can be achieved, and maybe to what extent it should be. They believe an authority is necessary to enforce those rules, or you get corporations and billionaires steering the government to wage wars for profit from oil, materials etc. like what’s happening now.

          Personally, I see being pro-China like they are on grad as much less worrying than being pro-US, the latter of which I have a feeling .world mods wouldn’t block because of their inherent western bias. Only one of the two have constantly invaded other countries for their resources, or overthrown democratically elected foreign governments to replace them with military dictatorships.

          • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Only one of the two have constantly invaded other countries

            The People of Tibet might disagree there. But this is a discussion for another Time.

            I’m not pro US either, tho. I just call out evil when I see it. And that’s my Problem with Lemygrad. They seem to believe there are only two sides. I can say America does bad things and China, Russia etc. does bad things. They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done. And that’s not how we come forward. Evil is Evil is Evil. No matter who does it.

            • Arelin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done

              That’s a heavy oversimplification of everything on there… I see the folks on grad being mad about bad decisions by China just the same; they just heavily scrutinize negative news for bias or misinfo, as people should do for everything.

              If you do scrutinize your news and sources, I think it’s only natural that you’d end up being very anti-west/imperialism, and far less anti-China, specially considering the grip western media and news have on the world. The two are just not equivalent at all.

              The People of Tibet might disagree there

              Here’s an example of that. The fact that China’s education system makes sure ~90% of Tibetans can speak their cultural language compared to the ~8% of North Americans that can speak theirs means they’re just not equivalent. The only countries accusing China of such a fucked up crime like cultural repression are western ones with a political/economic interest for doing so. Muslim countries and the global south side with China on this and Xinjiang.

              • DessertStorms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Amazing, it only took you 2 comments to land right on genocide denial, unprovoked.
                You’re a tankie, defending other tankies, and tankies aren’t communists, nor are you on the left, since you clearly aren’t in support of freedom and equality for all, never mind the rest of it, just more of the same bullshit - authoritarians co opting leftist ideas and language to grab power. Tale as old as fucking time…

              • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                You don’t get it. I don’t compare. It is not that is worse than that. China attacked Tibet and conquered their Land. I don’t need to compare this to the US. I don’t care if Country XYZ says it was good. Evil is Evil is Evil. Pull yourself away from comparing. You don’t have to weigh Evil against each other.

                EDIT:

                They pick one side and argue and justify away the crimes “their” Side has done.

                You are doing exactly that. You try to argue and justify the annexation of Tibet. You could easily say “Yeah, that was not okay. China invaded and occupied Tibet, this is not okay.” But instead you are trying to compare this to the US and bring up other Countries and what they think. THIS is exactly what I meant.

                • Arelin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  you are trying to compare this to the US and bring up other Countries and what they think

                  Shouldn’t we look at different sources and scrutinize events and claims thoroughly? You seem to be thinking you’re being objective by taking a centrist position on these but this

                  China invaded and occupied Tibet

                  is a western claim, and exactly what the US and EU wants its citizens to think by drawing a false equivalence between them and their geopolitical rival. Tibet had a popular revolutionary party whose views were in line with the rest of China that wanted China’s help overthrowing the Dalai Lama, under whom slavery and serfdom was common in the region. There absolutely were factions supporting the prior feudal rule, but chalking that up to “China invaded and occupied Tibet” is absurd and extremely misleading. Tibet is an autonomous region now.

                  Hell, the Tibetan uprising against the Chinese government later on was organized by the CIA, and the US is open about it and even proud of it now. Here’s a book on that written by a US district judge and a journal by a professor on Tibetan studies. It’s similar to how the US overthrew the democratically elected Mosaddegh in Iran because his policies would benefit Iran instead of the US.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is, for better or worse, authoritarianism on the left. “You will be fed and given a place to stay and personal safety… or else!” Even in its more benign forms (ex Bolshevism) it’s kinda bad imo. When it gets extreme it gets… well… being an English speaker i’m sure you’ve heard all about it.

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Bolshevism is pretty fucking far from benign considering it is the origin of authoritarian leftistism.

    • deleted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think lemmygrad isn’t that bad considering pedo.school is halfway through the list.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this highlights what people think when they hear “defederating” vs its actual purpose. It’s controversial when it’s between serious instances that people actually use but with wildly incompatible opinions, but there’s very few objections when it’s blocking CSAM!

      • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Okay, yeah this was my thought as I wrote this, I won’t deny it. But to be fair, LemmyGrad does more than just to be controversial. They provoke and brigade and justify terrible Crimes against Humanity. And I might bet that some of the Stuff they say could even be illegal here in Germany.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It is trivially easy to find examples of them wanting to nuke the US or kill all liberals or defending Soviet and Chinese pogroms, etc. I don’t understand how that’s really any different from saying “kill all Jews” or advocating for slavery tbh. As far as I can tell, the line exists because edgy redfash are mostly marginalized so nobody takes them seriously?

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I imagine most of the big servers have them blocked but it’s probably the individual servers that make up the majority of the numbers. If you’re self-hosting then you can just ignore instances you don’t like and be relatively confident they won’t hassle you. The other kind though, probably want to preempt them!