It genuinely took me a while to see what was wrong with it, my brain was autocorrecting it
Even after reading your comment, it took me three more tries to see it! Wild.
Many modern theories in cognitive science posit that the brain’s objective is to be a kind of “prediction machine” to predict the incoming stream of sensory information from the top down, as well as processing it from the bottom up. This is sometimes referred to through the aphorism “perception is controlled hallucination”.
So human thought is … text prediction?
In a sense… yes! Although of course it’s thought to be across many modalities and time-scales, and not just text. Also a crucial piece of the picture is the Bayesian aspect - which also involves estimating one’s uncertainty over predictions. Further info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_coding
It’s also important to note the recent trends towards so-called “Embodied” and “4E cognition”, which emphasize the importance of being situated in a body, in an environment, with control over actions, as essential to explaining the nature of mental phenomena.
But yeah, it’s very exciting how in recent years we’ve begun to tap into the power of these kinds of self-supervised learning objectives for practical applications like Word2Vec and Large Language/Multimodal Models.
We can have robots with bodies that talk and form relationships with people now. Not deep intimate relationships, but simple things like maintaining conversations with people. You wouldn’t need much more software on top of the LLM to make a really functional person.
I have to disagree about that last sentence. Augmenting LLMs to have any remotely person-like attributes is far from trivial.
The current thought in the field about this centers around so-called “Objective Driven AI”:
in which strategies are proposed to decouple the AI’s internal “world model” from its language capabilities, to facilitate hierarchical planning and mitigate hallucination.
The latter half of this talk by Yann LeCun addresses this topic too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd0JmT6rYcI
It’s very much an emerging and open-ended field with more questions than answers.
Pterty mcuh, as lnog as the frist and lsat ltteres are in the crrecot palecs.
That sounds extremely interesting, i gotta look into that when i have more time
See, I thought it was mildly infuriating because the images aren’t “many types of airplanes”, they’re only a few types of airplanes repeated at different sizes or different angles.
“They are many words.”
[Page with the word “word” in 3D at 10 different angles and rotations.]
They* are many words
So embarrassing… Fixed.
So is this just some AI generated crap or what
Yes it is.
Probably a bad transition, AI is fairly coherent nowadays when it comes to grammar and sentence structure, It’s facts it gets wrong.
Grammar aside, it’s an odd choice to fill up half the page with 747s if you want to showcase the variety of commercial passenger airplanes.
I’m more annoyed at the lack of anything prop.
Not everything is a international long haul.
This ladies and gentlemen is an example of people using ai to make kid books. It’s a big thing right now and easy money but could have consequence if kids start reading these at a young age.
The good thing is: This type of book is read by parents to their 1-3 year old kids. You show the pictures and can filter weird sentences. This is not a book a 9 year old is going to read 😉
Don’t try to redirect stupidity from people to computers. We’re more than capable of doing stupid things without the help of our AI overlords.
Damn right I are
No. AI wouldn’t mess up like that. It could spew other kinds of shit, but with excellent syntax. It’s far more likely for humans to make mistakes like that.
This ladies and gentlemen is an example of people using ai to make kid books. It’s a big thing right now and easy money but could have consequence if kids start reading
thesethey at a young age.FTFY
They is for thorses
That airport is too busy. I feel bad for the controllers.
“Real Air Traffic Controller plays MSFS1995”
I love those videos omg.
The issue is on both pages. Lack of knowledge of English on one, and lazy copy/pasta of similar airplanes on the other.
What’s wrong with it?
“They” instead of “their.”
Can’t tell if you’re trolling
His trolling what?
Ha. And now I’m crying/laughing. Thank you all.
Honest mistake, but I wanna double down because its funnier that way.
deleted by creator
What?
I meant “there.”
deleted by creator
they are so many planes
Depending on context, this might not be wrong. It could be part of an “it is an airplane” -> “they are a few airplanes” -> “they are so many airplanes!” progression.
Is it?
Previous page is:
Sometimes airplanes go round and round and upside down.
So sadly, no.
Yeah, that’s broken then. You at the very least need to have addressed which airplanes are being discussed before pulling out a pronoun.
Piece of shit book.
And that the book kids have to read from school to learn English. 🤦
All airplanes are jetliners.
Shortstop’s the best position they is.
Is the issue that all the plains are basically the same kind of wide and narrow-body passenger jets? Like there is hardly any variety in the images?
Buddy, we are talking about planes. But no, that isn’t the issue.
the issue is with the text.
it says “they are …” instead of “there are …”
Also airplanes instead of aeroplanes
(Which is correct so there’s nothing wrong with that)
I had to look a second time. My brain just auto-corrected that.
holy crap. I must have read it 3-4 times, STILL found nothing wrong, so I went to the comments. It took this comment train for me to see it, meaning you had to tell me literally what it was.
Human brains are so neat sometimes.
Guess what gets assembled in factories in Texas…
Do there make planes there?
Pft. Can’t even spell they’re. Figure it out.
deleted by creator
