• Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get why some people just refuse to use ad-blockers. They work absolutely flawlessly and I have not encountered an experience such as this in almost a decade.

  • Kalash@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    A perfect example for why having an adblocker is a necessity these days.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chances are, unless you made the website yourself, you don’t know who made certain decisions; who did specific work; how many people were actually available to do that work; how much pressure from shareholders there was to maximize income at the expense of user experience; any fiduciary challenges faced; or how often you had to overcome the urge to make a worthwhile product to further your goal of fitting as much ad space into a single page as possible (this one is HUGE).

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the even more disturbing trend of late is that

      1. nobody made any decisions
      2. nobody did any specific work
      3. nobody was available to do the work

      because an AI generated the entire content on the basis of an off-hand suggestion plugged in by a Search API directly reading some user’s query and shitting out a vapid, insipid extrapolation of that query in the rough shape of an article on-the-spot and brute force slamming SEO algorithms with keywords so it’s the first ten items you see when the search concludes.

  • puppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s why I use Firefox (Fennec to be exact) on Android with uBlock Origin.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Vivaldi browser is good for sites like that because you can use simplified view, which removes all the shit and just gives you the article text.

    The Reading Mode app on Android does this too.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why you want uBlock Origin:

    The internet has become unusable without an ad blocker. At this point, any browser that doesn’t include one is just a cybersecurity hazard. The NSA and CIA consider ad blockers a security measure, at least.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      It really has. Ublock is so versatile, too. It can block pretty much anything. I loathe using browsers without it installed.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I even install it on work computers. It’s not just plainly sexually explicit ads. It’s malware. Just say no to ads.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s about to get EVEN MORE unusable, because increasingly the alleged/so-called “content” behind the nag-wall is utterly mindless AI-generated sludge.

      • wishthane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also so many sites that haven’t given in to the ad content farm / have found it to not be worth it are now just putting up paywalls… which I’m okay with in principle, but in reality I can’t afford to subscribe to 20 different sites I only read occasionally

        There’s going to need to be a new model of revenue sharing somehow at some point. I wouldn’t mind paying for one subscription that gave me broad access, but the problem then is the control that gives whoever collects the money (e.g. YouTube Premium)

    • Maven (famous)@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure how to change the default browser that the Google news feeds opens up to on a pixel phone. Ever since posting this though I’ve been looking at other launchers with a need feed that let me open it in another browser.

      • PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it lets you disable Chrome (long tap → App Info), then do that. Otherwise you should use ADB to uninstall it like bloatware.

      • AzureFrost@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to disable the setting to “open web pages in the app”, you can find it in the general section in the Google feed settings. If your default browser is not chrome, it should open in that browser.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I have two solutions for you:

        1. Get rid of the Google feed which is crap, and a total BS that it doesn’t support your default browser unless disabling or getting rid of Chrome, you can use an app like Discovery Killer to get rid of it and replace it for another app, as I’m currently using Kvaesitso I have no need for doing that (Discovery Killer currently frozen), I can’t recall if the app needs root though (root FTW anyway).

        2. Continue to use it if you enjoy trash news sites with clic baits and such, you can block ads at a DNS level, through android settings or if you have a PiHole at the house, personally I use AdAway rooted version (root FTW x2) and my PiHole at house and with a VPN outside, I’m pretty sure AdAway tooks first, but meh, let’s have some redundancy 😂

        I’m pretty sure that could have been mentioned in this thread but I just wanted to explain my setup.

      • webhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have an option when it uses it’s internal browser to open in another browser. Sometimes it does that even though I’ve set it so l to use an external browser. But you should still be able to hit options in that internal browser and open in your default.

      • elvith@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can’t. Even when Firefox with uBO is your default browser and any other app just uses Firefox as the built-in browser, Google News will resort to Chrome.

        Workaroud: Open the website in Firefox instead of using the app - https://news.google.com/

        • kratoz29@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It will open Firefox or whatever your default browser is if you delete chrome or freeze it.

          It won’t open the usual webpage though, it will open and create a new tab in the browser, at least that is the behavior that I face with Firefox Beta.

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It will open Firefox or whatever your default browser is if you delete chrome or freeze it.

            I’ve tried this solution and it doesn’t work. Chrome is running within the Google News app. Even if you modify Chrome on your phone to have adblockers, the version of the browser that Google News opens is unmodified.

          • elvith@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            For me (on Firefox non-beta) it just opens the in-app browser and shoves ads down my throat. I just checked it, Chrome is disabled and cannot be uninstalled on my phone.

            When I have a page opened in the Google News App, I can tap the menu and select to open the web page from there. Then it gets opened in Firefox.

            • PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I recommend URLCheck — it intercepts the default browser and allows both modifying the opened URL (to remove tracking) and forcefully preventing the embedded browser (the bottom-left button).

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely, use an adblocker. You might even find that “reader mode” works just as well to force articles to be coherent.

  • Rosco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably not worth the read anyways. I disable the adblocker to gauge the quality of a website. If it’s a complete ad cluaterfuck, I never go to the website again.

  • fury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even worse is taking over the back button / back gesture to redirect you to “more to read before you go”

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I really wish Firefox ignored all of the dynamic “pages” or whatever it uses that causes back to just go to a different part of the same page. Go back to the last page that I clicked a link on. I know how to scroll back up.

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    And people wonder why nobody actually reads the article. Far easier to just read the headline on Lemmy and the expert commentary in the comments.

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the funniest part is that the browser even blocked some crap the site wanted to shove at you by default. This isn’t even the intended experience!