I’ve been seeing a lot of doom and gloom about VMware. The cutting of services and licensing changes of the cost of core offerings are huge issues. Is anyone planning or budgeting to change to another hypervisor? If so what?

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve kept away from VMWare most of my career. I’d personally push for something KVM/QEMU based, if possible, whether it be Proxmox, LXD, or a RHEL offering. If you are in a fully MS shop, probably Hyper-V.

  • WASTECH@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    We are an enterprise manufacturing company. We have lots of hosts on process networks not connected to the internet. Seems like the subscription license won’t be compatible, so we plan to seriously look at Proxmox for those in the coming years as we replace hosts.

    For our datacenter, we decided to move everything to Azure. This decision was in the works before the license change, but the acquisition by Broadcom and their track record certainly played a part in the conversation.

    For our site hosts, we are looking into Azure HCI or possibly Hyper-V, especially since these sites don’t have many VM’s and don’t need features offered by VMware.

    If you’re an Azure expert and are looking for a new job, send me a message. We’re hiring.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I work in sales. I don’t sell anything related to VMware directly but customers bring it up. They are looking at other alternatives. Not sure what changed In the last two weeks but there has been an uptick in my customers talking about it. It’s early stage, so they haven’t decided on the path but they’ve decided they need to leave.

    • Mautobu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Broadcom acquired VMware and has a reputation for making good value products into poor value product in the industry. They seem to be doing just that.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That was months ago. Two weeks ago all my customers seemed to come to the conclusion, it’s time to leave.

        I would have planned to leave as soon as I heard the announcement. Broadcom just raises prices, cuts support unless you’re their target customers.

        • elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          They canceled the ability to sell new licenses for all partners. For licenses ordered in time but not delivered before this it’s unknown whether you’ll get them. Their license activation portal went offline, so when you bought a license and got it, you couldn’t activate your software. Also they basically “fired” all of their partners and told them that they’re not eligible to offer VMWare hosting anymore unless they’re joining the new partner program and are accepted there. But it is unknown when the new partner program starts and what you hoops you have to jump through to get accepted.

          So… they basically fucked most of their direct and indirect customers and didn’t provide a way forward while doing so. No wonder everyone mistrusts them now and is looking for an alternative

          • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            They canceled the ability to sell new licenses for all partners.

            Ah that must be the new nail in the coffin.

            • elvith@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              From what I gathered from news articles it looks like they want more control over how and where you host and will be moving everything to subscription based licenses. So it somewhat makes sense to stop handing out the current licenses and offer new ones. Problem is that it doesn’t seem to be clear which licenses you can get, which conditions apply to those, where and when you can get them,…

              I think it would have been mostly fine if they had allowed for more ti.e to transition and had everything in place for the future. Then add some communication and there might have been a shitstorm, but not the mess that happened now…

              • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                will be moving everything to subscription based licenses.

                That is how the industry is moving. Everything I sell is a subscription model. If it’s SAAS, it makes sense. For on premise, not always but I get why companies are pushing it.

                When it was announced, not many customers were talking about it. All of a sudden, about 2-3 weeks ago, customers started moving meets because getting off VMware became a priority. Something freaked them out.

                When Broadcom bought symatec it took a year for people to start freaking out. That is when they got their first new bill and I saw bills tripple.

                • elvith@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I don’t mind it with SaaS. Also for enterprise software, you used to pay for the license and then a support package, which basically is a subscription, on top. So there’s nothing changing per se.

                  Problem for partners is, that they don’t know whether they’ll stay partners and whether they’ll be accepted in the new program. If not, they cannot provide their SaaS solution to their customers.

                  Imagine your company gets a letter from its MSP that basically reads: “Hey, VMWare doesn’t give us information about our way forward, we may be unable to continue to provide you with VMs. This happens to all partners, so no need to ask other MSPs, as those will tell you the same. We currently don’t know how to proceed, but in three months all VMs that you have hosted with us might be toast and the only people who can tell you what to do are at broadcom and don’t give out any information”

        • Mautobu@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think the penny dropped when layoffs were announced and channel partners were cut off.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unfortunately the boss man decided to stick with VMware instead of migrating to proxmox. Sadly there’s no good migration solutions for proxmox unless you’re ok with a lot of down time.

    Maybe if they can make a live convert tool I can convince him to make the switch. But until we can get past the hurdle of converting everything painfully we’re stuck.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not sure what or how it will affect us.

    We’re a mid sized org we may stick unless it gets to crazy

    It is kinda amazing that I’m assuming they did the math ; that so many smaller orgs just don’t matter

    • Mautobu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m kind of in the same boat. Mid sized with enough cash to deal with the new status quo.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m not affected by the change but I heard Proxmox and Xen brought up frequently as alternatives.

    Of course there are always cloud providers but that’s not really a good option for many.

    • Mautobu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I feel like Broadcom is aiming for cloud-like pricing for on prem services with none of the other benefits inherent to an Azure or AWS deployment. Not exactly the way to hold onto clients.

      I’m familiar with proxmox and the broader KVM ecosystem. I’m also a huge fan of Veeam, who have said they’re exploring support for proxmox. Shouldn’t be too difficult to implement, given they have a RHEL backup product already.

      Exciting stuff.

  • Urist@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    I work for Disney and we’re in the process of migrating all VMware boxes in our 3 data centers over to azure. We decided not to renew our contract with them. Guess it wasn’t just us?

    • comador @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Have your group ask microsoft what the charges for Azure will be for your year 3 year 4 and year 5 commitments.

      100% sure the Azure rep will gag on whatever they have in their mouths at that moment and start deflecting. If MS can fuck the US Government in a 10yr Azure contract, odds are pretty high they’ll do the same to Disney.

      Source: Our company bought into O365+Azure+ADFS at a good rate for 3yrs, then got burned by MS once the honeymoon was over. They’re not going to make it fun for you all once your contract ends.