Or would it be better to split it up on multiple devices? Or maybe just upgrade to a single RPi4 or 5 mod. B?

  • FrederikNJS@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    My home-assistant installation alone is too much for my Raspberry Pi 3. It depends entirely on how much data it’s processing and needing to keep in memory.

    Octoprint needs to respond in a timely manner, so you will want to have the system mostly idle (at least below 60 percent CPU at all times), preferably octoprint should be the only thing running on the system unless it’s rather powerful.

    If I were you, I would install octoprint exclusively on your Raspberry Pi 3, and then buy a Raspberry Pi 4 for the other services.

    I’m running Pi-hole and a wireguard VPN on an old Raspberry Pi 2, which is perfectly fine if you are not expecting gigabit speeds on the VPN.

  • skilltheamps@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    You do not want Octoprint on a machine that is busy. Otherwise you have load spikes that cause Octoprint to not be able to send the move-commands (gcode) as fast as the printer executes the movements. This problem is pronounced with faster printers and slicers that break up arcs into small straight lines (which is practically all slicers). Otherwise your printer stutters because it has to take small breaks to wait for the next command from octoprint.

    • B0rax@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      This right here.

      Octoprint (or any other 3d printer controller for that matter) should not run on a device which is doing unpredictable stuff at the same time.

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Op was so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I definitely get where they’re coming from though. It seems inefficient to have all these services running on separate hardware where each service might only be using 25% of the capability (not necessarily in OPs case with the Pi3B) of the device and needing three separate electrical outlets to do some real basic computing.

      I’ve been very casually exploring Proxmox on a micro Optiplex but haven’t had the time or need to jump in head first quite yet since things are still working. The real downside is that your single piece of hardware becomes a failure point for everything but as this is just home hobby stuff and not a big business, it’s not really that big of an issue.

  • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think it’s possible to run everything in the same RPi 3b, however I think it will not be smooth, cause there is only 1GB of ram available…

    I think the best is one device for each service, however I know that sometime we can’t afford that, so I think you need at least 1 device for Pi-Hole and Octoprint, and another to the Home Assistant

    • atomWood@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Definitely agree they should be split up if possible. Octoprint and Home Assistant are both rather demanding on a Pi, particularly the Pi 3B.

      I would however opt to run Pi-Hole on the Home Assistant device as there is a plugin built in for it, and Home Assistant is the kind of thing you would be more likely to leave on at all times.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just as a tangent, definitely get an SSD for whatever device is running HomeAssistant and set it as the boot drive as the constant writes will cause your SD card to explode in a huge fireball after not too long.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have PiHole and OpenMediaVault (with homeassistant docker, and dlna music server) running on a Pi2 2Gig. It has been totally fine

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    HA Home Assistant automation software
    ~ High Availability
    PiHole Network-wide ad-blocker (DNS sinkhole)
    RPi Raspberry Pi brand of SBC
    SBC Single-Board Computer
    SSD Solid State Drive mass storage
    VPN Virtual Private Network

    6 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.

    [Thread #609 for this sub, first seen 17th Mar 2024, 19:25] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • adONis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wouldn’t put pihole or any other mission critical network service on a Pi, unless there’s some kind of fallback.

    • halfwaythere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You could say that with most any hardware. You could have a dedicated server fail and have your network be down till you got another instance up or have a “fall back” kick in.

      What makes Rasp Pi so much more unstable? If anything a couple PIs are definitely a cheaper solution compared to other hardware like you are suggesting?

      • adONis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        couple of Pis are cheaper

        Are they thou? In my region the 4Bs are selling at around 60 bucks (no case, no SD)… A “couple” of them (including some for backup and HA and Octoprint) would mean at least 4 of them, totalling at 240 bucks (or 300 with SD). For that money, one could get two (or even three) more-than-capable thin clients.

      • adONis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        As some others mentioned, when the DNS goes down (which pihole is) your whole network is down. With the fragility (and slowness) of the PI, it’d be more likely it will go down, sooner than later.

        Considering the cost, a good alternative, imho, would be some sort of thin client, with an energy efficient CPU. So, instead of getting 2-3 PIs, better get one of these TCs, while keeping your PI as a DNS backup solution.

      • rambos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        IMO pi is perfect fit for pihole (low power and silent), but since its mission critical you want 2 devices running pihole. If one is down the other one will still be available. I have one pihole running on the server that runs all other services (including home assistant), and 2nd pihole on rpi4. Then I have another pi4 for 3D printer

        Running pohole and homeassistant on the same device is not a problem for sure, but not sure about octoprint since it is using USB serial connection while printer is active (can be 12h+). Maybe it can work, but I wouldnt use 3D printer computer for anything else