For context, I’m on an iPhone using Firefox. I can’t use uBlock Origin, but am ready to block on the DNS level after this.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I use an app called Recipe Keeper. It’s amazing because I just share the page to the app, it extracts the recipe without any nonsense, and now I have a copy for later if I want to reuse it. I literally never bother scrolling recipe pages because of how terrible they all are, and I decide in the app if the recipe is one I want to keep.

    It also bypasses paywalls and registration requirements for many sites because the recipe data is still on the page for crawlers even if it’s not rendered for a normal visitor.

    • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, that’s fine, but at some point we need to start talking about alternative methods of monetization for websites. On the one hand, compiling a list of recipies on a website and maintaining that website is not easy or cheap and the owners should be able to make money out of it. On the other hand, the user should be able to pay for this comfortably and have a nice experience on the website.

      This ad model doesn’t serve any of the two, business or consumer.

        • RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, but paid content is not the norm and the reason for that is that blatant advertising and shoving malaware down people’s throats on grandma’s recipe website is not only legal, it’s a predictable business model.

    • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      theres also cooked.wiki. tack “cooked.wiki/“ onto the start of a recipe URL and it scrapes and reformats for you

      • TodaviaTyler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can only save 20 recipes before you have to pay, but you can view as many as you like without saving them. Still, a very nice app IMO.

        • Adam Kempenich ✅ @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you’re using the app on a device, you can open links directly in it. So, if you have a bookmarks folder of recipes, you can just use your browser’s share button -> Open In -> Just the Recipe

          I’ll sound like an old man, but I miss the days of going to a website and not having to deal with the SEO junk.

  • nfsu2@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    ah yes, a $1500 phone with software that won’t allow you to do shit under the flag of security and UI.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Safari allows you to install adblockers, btw. Apple is overprotective but this isn’t really their fault.

      • nfsu2@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you are only concerned about blocking ads thats fine and good. But if your are concerned about privacy one should ditch apple devices altogether. Not to mention freedom.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      I DON’T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT YOUR GRANDMOTHER IN FACT IM GLAD THE BITCH IS DEAD

      -Things I never thought would cross my mind because of a cookie recipe

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    All people said not to mention that recipe is unnecessarily complex.

    Refrigerating the dough for an entire week will make it rather less potent, not more, while most of aroma components accumulation will happen through the first day. Not to mention here you allow it to stay at room temperature for 8 hours first before that, which is an overkill.

    Just keep it at room temperature for 2 hours, let it stay in your fridge for 24 hours and you’re good to go. Or just use the sourdough directly, that’ll do.

    Also, I hope you had at least 3 days (better a week for wild starters) of renewing the sourdough before you put it anywhere. Otherwise, it can have a very unstable and potentially even dangerous microbial composition.

    Source: I’m a bread technologist.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately, most of my sources are either in Russian or very academic. This open-access article does a good job of reviewing many academic sources, if you’re interested.

        Out of what’s popular and available in English, I’d strongly recommend Jeffrey Hamelman’s “Bread: A Baker’s Book of Techniques and Recipes”. It contains a lot of useful info on both sourdough and straight dough technology in a way that is home baker-friendly.

    • arvere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I found after years that starters work fine if I leave them in the fridge without feeding (sometimes for weeks) and then prepare and feed them overnight or 1 day before using it.

      would you say that’s dangerous?

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Depends on whether you allowed your starter to go through 2-3 cycles before putting it in the fridge. If yes, you’re all clear. Essentially what protects starters and sourdough from going bad is high acidity that they develop. If you give your starter enough time before preserving it, it will retain most of that acidity, allowing you to just feed it again and then use it. If not, you’re at risk of letting molds and other harmful organisms develop - some of them do grow at fridge temperatures, and if there’s no acidity to stop them, it can be not good.

        Anyway, it’s a good practice not to store sourdough for over a week - just in case.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I want a browser extension where I can press the “never again” button and all links to that domain will be marked. Then I know never to click to that search result or shared link.

    I’ve sort of done this manually for things like Twitter with some userStyles, but it is annoying to update and haven’t configured it on mobile. Kagi site-blocking is also great but only works from search results.

    • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      In Kagi, you can prioritize results from domains you trust and deprioritize or hide results from domains you don’t like.

  • theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I legitimately thought this was satire

    Are things really this bad without an ad blocker these days?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. For a long time I was trying to “play nice” and not go adblock. I didn’t mind ads that were unobtrusive and figured I’d roll with the ads for the sake of the sites. With things looking like this, and deliberately having ads load a little late and relayout the page to replace a link just as you were about to click in it, and ones that slipped even the pretense and pop up and ad instead of the actual link or button the first time. I would tend to just close such sites in disgust, and told my Google feed to not give me contemt from a couple of the worst owners that recurred.

      The final straw was a site that made the play embedded video function be ads the first two times on clicking it, as well as looking like that. On top of just having to give up on sites more and more.

      I read that majority of Internet users now use ad blockers. That didn’t used to be the case, and the large chunk of sites like this I’m sure is why.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is actually one of the biggest reasons why I prefer Android over iOS. In the case where I am forced to use iOS, I use Brave because it comes with an adblocker. Not perfect, but it’s the best of a crappy situation.

  • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You can block all these ads just with Safari or Firefox without uBlock Origin. I haven’t seen an ad on my iPhone in like a decade.

      • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Download Adblock / Adblock Plus / Adgaurd app. Follow the instructions in the app to add the Extension for Safari.

        For system-wide ad block in apps, use something like NextDNS. This blocks the app banners.

          • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I don’t use Firefox on iOS mobile devices. All browsers are just Safari with a different skin. Safari does all the ad block and anti-track. Sorry, if you were asking me about Firefox extensions.

            • puppy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Only Safari on iOS is about to change with EU laws. Not sure how it will affect outside the EU though.