The United States shot down more drones and missiles than Israel did on Saturday night during Iran’s attack, The Intercept can report.

More than half of Iran’s weapons were destroyed by U.S. aircraft and missiles before they ever reached Israel. In fact, by commanding a multinational air defense operation and scrambling American fighter jets, this was a U.S. military triumph.

The extent of the U.S. military operation is unbeknownst to the American public, but the Pentagon coordinated a multination, regionwide defense extending from northern Iraq to the southern Persian Gulf on Saturday. During the operation, the U.S., U.K., France, and Jordan all shot down the majority of Iranian drones and missiles. In fact, where U.S. aircraft originated from has not been officially announced, an omission that has been repeated by the mainstream media. Additionally, the role of Saudi Arabia is unclear, both as a base for the United States and in terms of any actions by the Saudi military.

“U.S. intelligence estimates that half of the weapons fired by Iran failed upon launch or in flight due to technical issues,” a U.S. Air Force senior officer told The Intercept. Of the remaining 160 or so, the U.S. shot down the majority, the officer said. The officer was granted anonymity to speak about sensitive operational matters.

    • machinin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That is what I was thinking, but also wonder if it was part of their show of power. They telegraphed their intentions fairly clearly. If they intentionally disabled half of the drones after take off, then it might simply be an additional warning. If this attack was shot down, could double the drones also be shot down? Just speculation, but I do have a feeling that there is more to it than just half malfunctioned.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        1. Take an estimate of how many you think they can stop, let’s say 100.

        2. Set up 500 in incrementally increasing waves, give them a weeks notice it’s coming, then a short warning before you launch.

        3. When some start to make it thru, flip a switch to drop some out of the next wave

        You now have an accurate number for how many drones/missiles can be shot out of the sky by Israel and the US over a range of time.

        This wasn’t an “attack” it was pushing up and finding out exactly how much Israel can handle.

        The implied threat being if Iran wanted to, they could overwhelm Israel’s defense, and they now know exactly how much that would take. Along with what out of a huge range of options gets thru best.

        Say they launch an actual attack, they could include a bunch of dummy ordnances delivered by the payloads most likely to be shot down, and prioritize the heaviest payloads in what’s less likely to be shot down.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The Iron Dome is looking pretty rusty… I wonder how much Likud diverted to private accounts in the Caymans.

    • MysticDaedra@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Iron Dome only protects against short-range rockets. Israel’s Arrow and Arrow II Endospheric and Exospheric anti-missile defense systems are what most of the missiles that were intercepted by Israel were shot down with.

  • MysticDaedra@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The implication is that without US assistance, Israel wouldn’t have been able to knock out all these missiles. That is unfounded, especially considering that Israel has one of the most advanced high-altitude SAM systems in the world, the Arrow and the Arrow II missile systems.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    …aight so fuck Israel in a “your genocide is abhorrent and you don’t deserve any support from anyone” kind of way, but if we’re going to support a genocidal ethnostate anyway, at least we’re doing it in a way that stops civilians from betting blown up, as opposed to handing them half a military’s worth of bombs for them to drop on other civilians.

    Now that that’s taken care of, could we maybe take the we’re planning on sending over to Israel for them to do even more genocide with, and send them to Ukraine or something so they can fight against genocide instead?

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Jordan directly not really. The American bases in Jordan shot down the drones.

        The Jordanian monarchy is heavily corrupt and bribed by America. They receive billions in weapons and bribes to suppress their population and turn the country into an American outpost near Syria and Iraq. Last year they got $1,619,118,868

        A prime example was the Tower22 base that got bombed in the beginning of this year

        Currently there are massive protests in Jordan against their regime.

    • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Slava Ukraini indeed. Israeli citizens do, however have some valid problems with how they’re treated by the Islamic nations :| killing a bunch of people where the population demographics is half children is indeed a bit ermh, uh questionable. Feel like having a war criminals trial would be suitable for Hamas and the IDF. What was the name of that unit? 8 something something 👁️👁️👁️📿📿📿🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yemeni. Else we could extrapolate into America bombing the Iranian consulate or directly committing the Genocide in Gaza.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Biden won’t put US military members in the way to deter an actual fucking genocide…

    But he’s scrambling jets to protect uninhabited areas in Israel?

    This isn’t just him supporting a genocide anymore, he’s not making logical decisions. He’s said for literal decades that nothing will ever make him lower his complete support of Israel, and he keeps showing us that’s true

    Someone with that kind of loyalty to any foreign government for any reason should disqualify them from holding at least the presidential office.

    It was bad when Trump was like this with Russia, and the whole Dem party agreed.

    Then Biden does the same shit and suddenly it’s ok?

    Fuck that noise.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a dumb take - I definitely want us to cut off military aide to Isreal that’s used for offensive purposes… but there’s no reason to let Iran bomb Isreal just because we’re pissed off about Palestine. Isreal being forced into a defensive war is only likely to accelerate deaths in Gaza.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        but there’s no reason to let Iran bomb Isreal just because we’re pissed off about Palestine

        So why aren’t we shooting down Israel’s attacks on Gaza?

        You can’t claim we shot these down just to avoid casualties out of respect for life when we’re actively helping commit a genocide.

        At least not if you want to convince anyone of anything logically.

        • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, for one, we don’t have bases positioned in the vast expanse between……checks….Israel and Gaza.

          I believe most of these shootdowns came from the Red Sea, Iraq, and Syria’s.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            What bases do we have between Iran and Israel?

            There’s one “base” in Israel…

            https://apnews.com/general-news-2ccf317f293d4be59b92cec5554c3db4

            Which exists inside of what was already an Israeli air base, is under control of Israel, and was only put there in name by trump so the US would have an excuse to attack anyone that attacks Israel.

            Like, this shit isn’t ancient history, but I’m constantly surprised on here that I’m the only one who remembers stuff from the last decade.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Iran hurting almost nobody is in everyone’s best interests.

      We don’t need Israel vs Iran lobbing missiles at each other or marching to attack each other. Shooting down every single Iranian rocket was the fastest and simplest way to peace.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Iran hurting almost nobody is in everyone’s best interests.

        The only mention of any injury from this was something that was shot down landed on someone…

        If all the “attack” hit the target, there would have been zero injury.

    • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t like that Biden is supporting Israel, but I’m not going to put him and Trump on the same level. Trump moved our embassy to Jerusalem. Biden has allowed a lot of shit I hate and don’t want us to be a part of, but acting like they’re one and the same is not helpful. Especially when we would have had boots on the ground helping Israel if Trump was in office.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If someone kicked you in the balls, would it be ok for everyone you meet after that to punch you in the face?

        Or do you keep the same social standards regardless of meeting one exceptionality shitty person?

        Would you get mad at the guy who just punched you? It was as bad as the kick in the nuts, so you can’t complain right?

        Logically speaking, you’re saying you’d accept the punch with a smile because it was worse before.

        • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’d rather take a hit to the face.

          You’re trying to summarize a situation into something small and easy for people, but it’s complex and shitty.

          I understand the plight of the people in Gaza and the absolutely abhorrent behavior my country has had towards them. I understand how the futuristic and advanced weapons made by my country have negatively impacted the world.

          I also now live in a world that deals with the results of Donald Trump in office. My mom, sister, niece and wife don’t have access to the same healthcare they once did that was a right to them. I have a court system now that’s so skewed compared to American politics that it dictates policy to us rather than democratically enables the people. I live under a system of moved goal posts because Trump made the wall into a whole thing, and now everyone looks to shut the border down constantly rather than dealing with the reasons people flood across it. Every day people in my country die from gun violence and expanded police powers both of which rapidly increased under Trump and who changed the laws making it easier to purchase weapons and who made police more resistant to citizen committees.

          And before you switch to the “why don’t you then change it” we’re working on. The journey of a thousand miles begins with the first steps. Fascists don’t just go away when they lose. They fester. Trying to throw it all away means potentially creating one of the bloodiest conflicts the world has ever seen because we’re upset temporarily. I get that people are needlessly dying, but more will die no matter what we do. Staying the course, correcting the effects of Donald Trump, changing the tides of American politics and shifting the left actually left is the best course of action right now. We’re getting there. Not as fast as I or others like, but I see it every day.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re trying to summarize a situation into something small and easy for people, but it’s complex and shitty

            It’s definitely shitty, but the choice to support a genocide or not is surprisingly easy…

            Like, you act like what good Biden has done inexplicably comes with the evil Biden does.

            We could have someone that helps.more and does less evil.

            To take it back to my “small and easy” analogy, someone that shakes your hand, or at least just gives one of those barely noticable head nods without a change in facial expression even.

            You’ve let the guy who kicked you in the nuts lower the bar too much, youve forgotten what acceptable behavior looks like.

            • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              We could have someone that helps more and does less evil.

              Really? Who?

              You “genocide joe” folks keep saying there’s a better choice, but nobody will give me a name, a website, a campaign address I can send money to, anything. Show the candidate that can literally win in 7 months. Otherwise, you’re asking me to put my family at additional risk for the payoff of helping exactly 0 people in Gaza… unless you define helping as Israel “finishing the job.”

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                You want one name?

                Elizabeth Warren.

                But that’s not the only name.

                Hell, the major reason for voting Biden is literally that he’s not trump, a qualification everyone eligible to run for president shares, except trump.

                Do you honestly think 7 months isn’t enough time to run a general campaign? Why is the primary not scheduled to end for two more months if that’s true?

                Seriously, how can you rationalize the primary not being scheduled to end for two more months if that’s not enough time for a general campaign?

                I’m dying to hear your answer.

                • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I actually voted for Warren in the primaries last cycle. As far as I know, she isn’t running this cycle and isn’t on the ballot in any states that have already passed the8r registration deadlines.

                  I know for a fact that 7 months isn’t long enough to run a presidential campaign because, again, you have to have filed to run usually a year in advance. Unless you’re suggesting that Warren is running the best write-in campaign in American history. I’m happy to help her, but I’m a little worried I haven’t heard a word about it from her or any PACs.

            • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re right, we should bring back the guy who kicked me in the nuts, but now has threatened to kill me too. Genius level.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                If it’s too late to change candidates, why hasn’t the DNC convention taken place?

                Why did they schedule it so late in the summer that they missed multiple state deadlines to be on general election ballots?

                And if your answer is going to have anything to do with the DNC being completely incompetent: why are you insisting we keep letting them be the only thing that stands between America and trump?

                • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  If it’s too late to change candidates, why hasn’t the DNC convention taken place?

                  Who, exactly, would be an ideal candidate at this point to replace Biden that has a hope in hell of winning? Who, exactly, has the national recognition to pull that off in the Democrat party, or really any other party, in November of this year?

        • bobburger@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m definitely voting for Joe Biden now. Hopefully his strong EPA regulations will get the lead out of the paint that you’re eating.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Why is it the Biden supporters that sound most like trump supporters always have a post history making pro genocide comments too?

            I’ve noticed it a lot, so I’m genuinely curious.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          If someone kicked you in the balls, would it be ok for everyone you meet after that to punch you in the face?

          But that isn’t the situation. The situation is that you can choose to let someone kick you in the balls, or you can choose to let a whole gang mug you. There isn’t a third choice, no matter how much you want there to be. Third party candidates are a great ideal, but until we have a different voting system, it will continue being an ideal instead of reality.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            There isn’t a third choice,

            The primary still isn’t over, but people have been saying that for years…

            We get two poor decisions every four years, and shit ain’t going to change as long as two private organizations are the only two options.

            It’s easy for the DNC to match what it’s voters want, but they’ve become out right antagonistic towards their voting base, and voters can’t really do anything because at the end of the day our political parties are private groups with no responsibility to voters.

            So you can keep blindly supporting them, but in case you haven’t noticed, it loses the party voters every election. If you really just care about beating republicans, then you should be putting you’re energy to pulling the party left.

            Not telling people to give up an accept this as best possible.